Collaboration within and between teams in multi-team R&D projects

Large-scale R&D projects are often carried out employing a number of teams working simultaneously on separate sub-tasks. Such R&D projects constitute highly interrelated team-based organizations, where the complexity of the task and the time constraint of the project make collaboration on various levels of the organization a crucial prerequisite for success. While collaboration within teams (teamwork) has been theoretically and empirically investigated both in Europe and the US, the integration of multiple teams within an R&D project, however, has received little attention in management research. Two main questions seem of particular importance in this regard: how can we conceptualize and measure the quality of collaboration within and between teams? How strong is the relationship between collaboration on both levels (within and between teams) and the performance of individual teams in the project? This paper contributes to answering these questions by developing a theoretical concept of the quality of collaboration within and between teams. Using data from 191 personal interviews relating to all 39 simultaneous engineering teams of an automotive development project in Europe, we evaluate our concept of collaboration in team-based R&D organizations and test the relationships of these constructs with relevant measures of team performance (quality of outcome, adherence to budget, adherence to schedule). The findings indicate that measures of collaboration both within and between teams are positively related to the quality of the outcome (e.g., the quality of the part developed) and the adherence to schedules on the team level. The teams' adherence to budget is positively related only to the quality of integration as a measure of between-team collaboration. Important implications for management practice and research are discussed.

[1]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[2]  H.G. Gemuenden,et al.  Success factors of project management: the critical few-an empirical investigation , 1997, Innovation in Technology Management. The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET '97.

[3]  S. Scott Social identification effects in product and process development teams , 1997 .

[4]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing and leading team-based organizations : A workbook for organizationalself-design , 1997 .

[5]  L. H. Pelled Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[6]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[7]  O. Hauptman,et al.  The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: an empirical study of cross-functional teams , 1996 .

[8]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 1995 .

[9]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The Measurement of Team Process , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[10]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[11]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[13]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[14]  M. Petty,et al.  Team-Member Exchange Under Team and Traditional Management , 1995 .

[15]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  The Impact of Group Interaction Styles on Problem-Solving Effectiveness , 1994 .

[16]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[17]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[18]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[19]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Group Goals, Group Coordination, and Group Member Motivation , 1993 .

[20]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[21]  L. Weingart Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance , 1992 .

[22]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[23]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[24]  E. Salas,et al.  Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. , 1992 .

[25]  Brian Shaw,et al.  Successful product development , 1991 .

[26]  E. V. Seregelyi,et al.  Managing the R&D-marketing interface , 1991, Technology Management : the New International Language.

[27]  David Wilemon,et al.  A field study of intergroup integration in technology-based organizations , 1991 .

[28]  J. Pinto,et al.  Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development , 1990 .

[29]  Deborah G. . Ancona Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[30]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[31]  D. Tjosvold Cooperative and Competitive Interdependence , 1988 .

[32]  David Wilemon,et al.  Managing the R&D-Marketing Interface , 1987 .

[33]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence , 1987 .

[34]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[35]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Understanding groups in organizations. , 1987 .

[36]  D. Tjosvold Cooperation Theory and Organizations , 1984 .

[37]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[38]  M. Tushman Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[39]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[40]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .