Resource allocation and cooperative behavior in fading multiple-access channels under uncertainty

The problems of resource allocation and the characterization of cooperative behavior in a two-user fading multiple-access channel (MAC) in the presence of uncertainty about the channel state information at the transmitters (CSIT) are considered. Game-theoretic techniques are used to characterize cooperative behavior and obtain the system operation point from an individualistic perspective. A two-user bargaining problem formulation, with the utility function being defined as the average rate each user can achieve, is used to obtain a fair and efficient operating point. It is shown that for the conventional bargaining problem formulation, the Nash Bargaining Solution (NBS) is very sensitive to the CSIT, and hence may result in considerable performance degradation. A modified bargaining problem formulation, that does not require an explicit modeling of the actual CSIT error, is proposed to address this issue, and shown to provide significant robustness to the system.

[1]  W. C. Riddell,et al.  Bargaining under Uncertainty , 1981 .

[2]  Hesham El Gamal,et al.  The Water-Filling Game in Fading Multiple-Access Channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Muriel Médard,et al.  The effect upon channel capacity in wireless communications of perfect and imperfect knowledge of the channel , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  David Tse,et al.  Multiaccess Fading Channels-Part I: Polymatroid Structure, Optimal Resource Allocation and Throughput Capacities , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Wireless channel allocation using an auction algorithm , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Dynamic rate allocation in fading multiple access channels , 2008, 2008 Information Theory and Applications Workshop.

[7]  Ravi Narasimhan,et al.  Individual Outage Rate Regions for Fading Multiple Access Channels , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[8]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[9]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  Optimum power control over fading channels , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Michael Mecking Resource allocation for fading multiple-access channels with partial channel state information , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[11]  T.F. Wong,et al.  Active user cooperation in fading multiple-access channels , 2008, MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[12]  Ravi Narasimhan CTH05-1: Effect of Channel Estimation Errors on Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff in Multiple Access Channels , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.

[13]  Wei Yu,et al.  Optimal power control in multiple access fading channels with multiple antennas , 2001, ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240).

[14]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Outage capacities and optimal power allocation for fading multiple-access channels , 1999, WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466).