Embodied Metaphors and Creative “Acts”

Creativity is a highly sought-after skill. Prescriptive advice for inspiring creativity abounds in the form of metaphors: People are encouraged to “think outside the box,” to consider a problem “on one hand, then on the other hand,” and to “put two and two together” to achieve creative breakthroughs. These metaphors suggest a connection between concrete bodily experiences and creative cognition. Inspired by recent advances in the understanding of body-mind linkages in the research on embodied cognition, we explored whether enacting metaphors for creativity enhances creative problem solving. Our findings from five studies revealed that both physical and psychological embodiment of metaphors for creativity promoted convergent thinking and divergent thinking (i.e., fluency, flexibility, or originality) in problem solving. Going beyond prior research, which focused primarily on the kind of embodiment that primes preexisting knowledge, we provide the first evidence that embodiment can also activate cognitive processes that facilitate the generation of new ideas and connections.

[1]  D. Cohen,et al.  Culture and the Structure of Personal Experience: Insider and Outsider Phenomenologies of the Self and Social World , 2007 .

[2]  T. Ormerod,et al.  Convergent, but not divergent, thinking predicts susceptibility to associative memory illusions , 2011 .

[3]  D. Hocevar.  A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. , 1979, Journal of personality assessment.

[4]  Sharon Bailin.  CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[5]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect and cognition: The hard interface. , 1985 .

[6]  Hans Ijzerman,et al.  The Thermometer of Social Relations , 2009, Psychological science.

[7]  D. Simonton.  Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[8]  Brian P. Meier,et al.  A metaphor-enriched social cognition. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  A Brain Mechanism for Facilitation of Insight by Positive Affect , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Cohen,et al.  The Soft Embodiment of Culture , 2007, Psychological science.

[11]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  J. Bargh,et al.  Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth , 2008, Science.

[13]  J. Rossiter,et al.  The Remote Associates Test: Divergent or Convergent Thinking? , 1966, Psychological reports.

[14]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  The embodied self: Making a fist enhances men's power-related self-conceptions , 2009 .

[16]  Fiona Lee,et al.  Connecting the Dots Within , 2008, Psychological science.

[17]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[18]  M. McGlone,et al.  Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. , 1998 .

[19]  S. Mednick,et al.  INCUBATION OF CREATIVE PERFORMANCE AND SPECIFIC ASSOCIATIVE PRIMING. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  C. Chiu,et al.  Multicultural Experience, Idea Receptiveness, and Creativity , 2010 .

[21]  H. T. H. PIAGGIO,et al.  Analysis of Intelligence , 1936, Nature.

[22]  D. Cohen,et al.  The hard embodiment of culture , 2009 .

[23]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  L. Ost.  The claustrophobia scale: a psychometric evaluation. , 2007, Behaviour Research and Therapy.

[25]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  Moving Through Time , 2010, Psychological science.

[26]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[27]  Andreas Fink,et al.  Do creative people use shorter associative pathways , 2010 .

[28]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence , 2010 .

[29]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[30]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[31]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  C. Nemeth.  Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[33]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Personal Need for Structure and Creative Performance: The Moderating Influence of Fear of Invalidity , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[34]  H. Ijzerman,et al.  From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches--bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. , 2006 .

[36]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Covert shifts of attention function as an implicit aid to insight , 2009, Cognition.

[37]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought , 2002, Psychological science.

[38]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Thomas W. Schubert.  Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.