An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California&Apos;S Electricity Industry

We use demand and plant-level cost data to simulate competition in a restructured California electricity market. This approach recognizes that firms might have an incentive to restrict output in order to raise price and enables us to explicitly analyze each firm's ability to do so. We find that, under the current structure of generation ownership, there is potential for significant market power in high demand hours. During some months, congestion over Path 15, the primary in-state north-south transmission line, exacerbates the market power potential in northern California. While these results make deregulation of generation less attractive than if there were no market power, they do not suggest that deregulation would be a mistake. Nearly all markets exhibit some degree of market power. We find that the levels of hydroelectric production and the elasticity of demand are two of the most important factors in determining the severity of market power, having greater impact on equilibrium prices than the proposed divestitures of California's largest producers. These results indicate that policies promoting the responsiveness of both consumers and producers to price fluctuations can have a significant effect on reducing the market power problem.

[1]  Catherine D. Wolfram,et al.  Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1999 .

[2]  R. Walther,et al.  Must-run generation: can we mix regulation and competition successfully? , 1997 .

[3]  S. Borenstein,et al.  The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry , 1997 .

[4]  J. Cardell Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks , 1997 .

[5]  E. Kahn,et al.  Simulating electricity restructuring in California: Interactions with the regional market , 1997 .

[6]  S. Stoft California's ISO: why not clear the market? , 1996 .

[7]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Folk theorems on transmission access: Proofs and counterexamples , 1996 .

[8]  R. Green,et al.  Increasing Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1996 .

[9]  Steven Stoft,et al.  Market power in California electricity markets , 1995 .

[10]  David M Newbery,et al.  Power Markets and Market Power* , 1995 .

[11]  B. Owen,et al.  Electric Utility Mergers: Principles of Antitrust Analysis , 1994 .

[12]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Theories of Cartel Stability and the Joint Executive Committee , 1994 .

[13]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Network costs and the regulation of wholesale competition in electric power , 1993 .

[14]  Severin Borenstein,et al.  Dynamic Pricing in Retail Gasoline Markets , 1993 .

[15]  N. M. Fehr,et al.  SPOT MARKET COMPETITION IN THE UK ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY , 1993 .

[16]  Andrew Powell,et al.  TRADING FORWARD IN AN IMPERFECT MARKET: THE CASE OF ELECTRICITY IN BRITAIN* , 1993 .

[17]  Blaise Allaz,et al.  Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency , 1993 .

[18]  R. Green,et al.  Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Friedel Bolle,et al.  Supply function equilibria and the danger of tacit collusion: The case of spot markets for electricity , 1992 .

[20]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[21]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  One is almost enough for monopoly , 1987 .

[22]  Carl Davidson,et al.  Long-Run Competition in Capacity, Short-Run Competition in Price, and the Cournot Model , 1986 .

[23]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Estimating Effective Concentration in Deregulated Wholesale Electricity Markets , 1984 .

[24]  R. Redding Reliability Criteria , 1977 .

[25]  Frank A. Wolak,et al.  Reliability Must-Run Contracts for the California Electricity Market , 1999 .

[26]  J. Perloff,et al.  Modern Industrial Organization , 1990 .

[27]  Faruk Gul Noncooperative Collusion in Durable Goods Oligopoly , 1987 .

[28]  R. Porter A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880-1886 , 1983 .

[29]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes , 1983 .