The child as linguistic icon-maker

Crosslinguistic child language data show children prefer unifunctional and analytic grammatical forms, as reflected in explicit morphosyntactici and syntactic variability of sentence forms.

[1]  Notes on the Talk of a Two-And-A-Half Year Old Boy , 1914 .

[2]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  How Hungarian children learn to speak , 1974 .

[3]  John Haiman,et al.  THE ICONICITY OF GRAMMAR: ISOMORPHISM AND MOTIVATION , 1980 .

[4]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[5]  D. Slobin Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar , 1973 .

[6]  D. Bickerton The roots of language , 2016 .

[7]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Learning the Structure of Causative Verbs: A Study in the Relationship of Cognitive, Semantic and Syntactic Development. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, No. 8. , 1974 .

[8]  P. Menyuk Sentences Children Use , 1969 .

[9]  Inflectional affixes used by Finnish-speaking children aged 1-3 years , 1980 .

[10]  F. Antinucci,et al.  How children talk about what happened , 1976, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  D. Slobin The Origins of Grammatical Encoding of Events , 1982 .

[12]  O. Behaghel,et al.  Deutsche Syntax : eine geschichtliche Darstellung , 1923 .

[13]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference , 1979 .

[14]  Joan L. Bybee Diagrammatic iconicity in stem-inflection relations , 1985 .

[15]  Y. Levy It's frogs all the way down , 1983, Cognition.

[16]  M. Bowerman Starting to talk worse: Clues to language acquisition from children's late speech errors , 1982 .

[17]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Beyond communicative adequacy: From piecemeal knowledge to an integrated system in the child's acquisition of language , 1985 .