The DNA of our regions: artificial intelligence in regional planning

Researchers frequent concern with the separation between the computational modeling field and the development of theories is the starting point of this paper main claim that new Artificial Intelligence fields such as Artificial Life and Cellular Automaton can unite both areas (theory and model development), by defining data-led theory. To support this claim this paper stresses that it is possible to define a regional DNA1 through the use of CA models, and by doing so contribute to the development of theory. First the main historical phases of the computer model simulations in planning are presented. Second, the reasons why CAs are sensitive to local conditions and why that is very useful both as descriptive and prescriptive tool in planning (and in its tacit application) are detailed. Finally, it explores how the use of these calibration values can have another function by identifying keys/DNAs of each region. The use of two case studies points to the fact that it is indeed possible to define a regional DNA. Applications go beyond purely descriptive elements; they might have something to say in terms of data-led theories. Unlike past theories, they need to reflect an increasingly complex world, but keep with a simplicity that makes them very appealing.

[1]  R. Klosterman.  Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning , 1997 .

[2]  Christopher G. Langton,et al.  Studying artificial life with cellular automata , 1986 .

[3]  Douglass B. Lee.  Retrospective on Large-Scale Urban Models , 1994 .

[4]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[5]  Elisabete A. Silva,et al.  Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal , 2002 .

[6]  Howard W. Bevis.  A Model for Predicting Urban Travel Patterns , 1959 .

[7]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  Large-Scale Urban Models Retrospect and Prospect , 1994 .

[8]  William B. Calland.  Traffic Forecasting for Freeway Planning , 1959 .

[9]  John von Neumann,et al.  Theory Of Self Reproducing Automata , 1967 .

[10]  M. Batty.  A CHRONICLE OF SCIENTIFIC PLANNING - THE ANGLO-AMERICAN MODELING EXPERIENCE , 1994 .

[11]  M. M. Webber.  Land Use and Traffic Models: A Progress Report , 1959 .

[12]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[13]  H. Blumenfeld.  Are Land Use Patterns Predictable , 1959 .

[14]  E. Masini,et al.  New challenges for futures studies , 2001 .

[15]  Christopher G. Langton,et al.  Artificial Life , 2019, Philosophical Posthumanism.

[16]  P. Michel,et al.  Towards a new technology future approach , 2003 .

[17]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  Cellular Worlds: A Framework for Modeling Micro—Macro Dynamics , 1985 .

[18]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[19]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Self-Organized Settlements , 2001 .

[20]  M Batty,et al.  Preliminary Evidence for a Theory of the Fractal City , 1996, Environment & planning A.

[21]  A. M. Voorhees.  The Nature and Uses of Models in City Planning , 1959 .

[22]  S. Openshaw,et al.  Geographical Information and Planning , 1999 .

[23]  Arthur Row,et al.  The Economic Forces Shaping Land Use Patterns , 1959 .

[24]  Douglass B. Lee.  Requiem for Large-Scale Models , 1973 .

[25]  Britton Harris,et al.  The Real Issues Concerning Lee's “Requiem” , 1994 .

[26]  Robert J. Leonard,et al.  From Parlor Games to Social Science: Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory, 1928-1994 , 1995 .

[27]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  The science of ‘what-if?’ , 1997 .

[28]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Artificial intelligence in geography , 1997 .

[29]  Subhrajit Guhathakurta,et al.  Urban Modeling and Contemporary Planning Theory: Is There a Common Ground? , 1999 .

[30]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  The future of futures decision making , 2003 .

[31]  Joe Ravetz,et al.  Citizen participation for integrated assessment: New pathways in complex systems , 1999 .

[32]  John R Hamburg,et al.  Predicting Chicago's Land Use Pattern , 1959 .

[33]  Robert L. Morris,et al.  Transit vs. Auto Travel in the Future , 1959 .

[34]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Ray Wyatt.  Computer-aided policymaking : lessons from strategic planning software , 1999 .

[36]  Ema Silva.  Including Expert Knowledge in the urban modeling process , 2002 .

[37]  C. Hodgkinson.  Challenge and response. Presidential address. , 1968, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  C. Webster.  Urban Morphological Fingerprints , 1995 .

[39]  M. Wegener.  Operational Urban Models State of the Art , 1994 .

[40]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function , 1996 .

[41]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  On the Measurement and Generalisation of Urban Form , 2000 .

[42]  Michael Marien,et al.  Futures studies in the 21st Century: a reality-based view , 2002 .