Performance Evaluation of a High Solar Fraction CPC-Collector System

One of the most important goals on solar collector development is to increase the system’s annual performance without increasing overproduction. The studied collector is formed by a compound parabolic reflector which decreases the collector optical efficiency during the summer period. Hence, it is possible to increase the collector area and thus, the annual solar fraction, without increasing the overproduction. Collector measurements were fed into a validated TRNSYS collector model which estimates the solar fraction of the concentrating system and also that of a traditional flat plate collector, both for domestic hot water production. The system design approach aims to maximise the collector area until an annual overproduction limit is reached. This is defined by a new deterioration factor that takes into account the hours and the collector temperature during stagnation periods. Then, the highest solar fraction achieved by both systems was determined. The results show that, at 50° tilt in Lund, Sweden, the concentrating system achieves 71% solar fraction using 17 m2 of collector area compared to 66% solar fraction and 7 m2 of a flat plate collector system. Thus, it is possible to install 2.4 times more collector area and achieve a higher solar fraction using the load adapted collector. However, the summer optical efficiency reduction was proven to be too abrupt. If the reflector geometry is properly design, the load adapted collector can be a competitive solution in the market if produced in an economical way. (Less)

[1]  G. Morrison,et al.  Optimisation of minimum backup solar water heating system , 2003 .

[2]  Björn Karlsson,et al.  Biaxial model for the incidence angle dependence of the optical efficiency of photovoltaic and solar thermal systems with two-dimensional reflectors , 2004 .

[3]  Julio Chaves,et al.  Ultra flat ideal concentrators of high concentration , 2000 .

[4]  W. R. McIntire.  Factored approximations for biaxial incident angle modifiers , 1982 .

[5]  Bengt Perers,et al.  On the factorisation of incidence angle modifiers for CPC collectors , 1995 .

[6]  Spiros Papaefthimiou,et al.  CPC solar collectors with flat bifacial absorbers , 2000 .

[7]  Björn Karlsson,et al.  Evaluation of CPC-collector designs for stand-alone, roof- or wall installation , 2005 .

[8]  Björn Karlsson,et al.  Biaxial model for the incidence angle dependence of the optical efficiency of photovoltaic systems with asymmetric reflectors , 2006 .

[9]  J. Widén,et al.  Constructing load profiles for household electricity and hot water from time-use data—Modelling approach and validation , 2009 .

[10]  A. Farouk Kothdiwala.  The effect of variation of angle of inclination on the performance of low-concentration-ratio compou , 1995 .

[11]  Bengt Perers,et al.  Dynamic method for solar collector array testing and evaluation with standard database and simulation programs , 1993 .

[12]  A. F. Kothdiwala.  96/02844 - The effect of variation of angle of inclination on the performance of low-concentration-ratio compound parabolic concentrating solar collectors , 1996 .

[13]  Bengt Perers.  An improved dynamic solar collector test method for determination of non-linear optical and thermal characteristics with multiple regression , 1997 .

[14]  Chris Bales,et al.  A Solar Collector Model for TRNSYS Simulation and System Testing , 2002 .

[15]  Ewa Wäckelgård,et al.  Industrially sputtered solar absorber surface , 1998 .

[16]  Björn Karlsson,et al.  The impact of optical and thermal properties on the performance of flat plate solar collectors , 2000 .

[17]  Svante Nordlander,et al.  Evaluation of a spring/fall-MaReCo , 2002 .