Simulation Based Probabilistic Risk Assessment (SIMPRA): Risk Based Design

The classical approach to design a system is based on a deterministic perspective where the assumption is that the system and its environment are fully predictable, and their behaviour is completely known to the designer. Although this approach may work fairly well for regular design problems, it is not satisfactory for the design of highly sensitive and complex systems where significant resources and even lives are at risk. In addition it can results in extra costs of over-designing for the sake of safety and reliability. In this paper, a risk-based design framework using Simulation Based Probabilistic Risk Assessment (SIMPRA) methodology is proposed. SIMPRA allows the designer to use the knowledge that can be expected to exist at the design stage to identify how deviations can occur; and then apply these high-level scenarios to a rich simulation model of the system to generate detailed scenarios and identify the probability and consequences of these scenarios. SIMPRA has three main modules including Simulator, Planner and Scheduler, and it approach is much more efficient in covering the large space of possible scenarios as compared with, for example, biased Monte Carlo simulations because of the Planner module which uses engineering knowledge to guide the simulation process. The value-added of this approach is that it enables the designer to observe system behaviour under many different conditions. This process will lead to a risk-informed design in which the risk of negative consequences is either eliminated entirely or reduced to an acceptable range. For illustrative purposes, an earth observation satellite system example is introduced.

[1]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 1: Overview of the IDAC Model , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Ramin Roshandel,et al.  Aging based optimal scheduling framework for power plants using equivalent operating hour approach , 2017 .

[3]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Supervised Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Complex Systems, Part 1: General Overview , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Pasquale Arpaia,et al.  Conceptual design of a machine learning-based wearable soft sensor for non-invasive cardiovascular risk assessment , 2021 .

[5]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of decision-making in emergencies for complex systems, case study: Dynamic positioning drilling unit , 2021 .

[6]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Guided simulation for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems: Concept, method, and application , 2022, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Eslam Ezzatneshana,et al.  EVALUATION OF OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF MICRO CHP SYSTEMS IN DIFFERENT SECTORS IN IRAN , 2014 .

[8]  Natasha Smith,et al.  System Risk Assessment and Allocation in Conceptual Design , 2003 .

[9]  Brady J. McKee,et al.  Qualitative emphysema and risk of COPD hospitalization in a multicenter CT lung cancer screening cohort study. , 2020, Respiratory medicine.

[10]  Yordan Garbatov,et al.  Risk-based framework for ship and structural design accounting for maintenance planning , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[11]  Alan F. Hamlet,et al.  A risk-based analytical framework for quantifying non-stationary flood risks and establishing infrastructure design standards in a changing environment , 2020 .

[12]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  PRA: A PERSPECTIVE ON STRENGTHS, CURRENT LIMITATIONS, AND POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS , 2014 .

[13]  Yadollah Saboohi,et al.  Efficient health monitoring of buildings using failure modes and effects analysis case study: Air handling unit system , 2020 .

[14]  Dimitrios Konovessis,et al.  Preliminary design of a tanker ship in the context of collision-induced environmental-risk-based ship design , 2019 .

[15]  Yadollah Saboohi,et al.  Efficient performance monitoring of building central heating system using Bayesian Network method , 2019 .

[16]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Application of event sequence diagram to evaluate emergency response actions during fire-induced domino effects , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of contaminant release from a radioactive waste deposit , 2003, Math. Comput. Simul..

[18]  Zineb Simeu-Abazi,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Automatic generation of generalized event sequence diagrams for guiding simulation based dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems , 2007 .

[20]  B J Garrick,et al.  Fitting Hierarchical Holographic Modeling into the Theory of Scenario Structuring and a Resulting Refinement to the Quantitative Definition of Risk , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[22]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  An Entropy Based Bayesian Network Framework for System Health Monitoring , 2018, Entropy.

[23]  F. Goerlandt,et al.  Review of risk-based design for ice-class ships , 2019, Marine Structures.

[24]  S. Hasan,et al.  Corrosion risk-based subsea pipeline design , 2018 .

[25]  Gerhard Wotawa,et al.  Risks due to beyond design base accidents of nuclear power plants in Europe—the methodology of riskmap , 1998 .

[26]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Adaptive simulation for system reliability analysis of large structures , 2000 .

[27]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Temporal decision-making factors in risk analyses of dynamic positioning operations , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Majid Amidpour,et al.  Aging based design and operation optimization of organic rankine cycle systems , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[29]  Lei Yang,et al.  Bayesian Belief Network-based approach for diagnostics and prognostics of semiconductor manufacturing systems , 2012 .

[30]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Data driven approach to risk management and decision support for dynamic positioning systems , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems, part 2: Application to risk-informed decision making, practice and results , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Adele H. Marshall,et al.  Exploring dynamic Bayesian belief networks for intelligent fault management systems , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.