Correction of respiratory and cardiac motion in cardiac PET/MR using MR-based motion modeling

Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) imaging suffers from image blurring due to the constant motion of the heart that can impact interpretation. Hybrid PET/magnetic resonance (MR) has the potential to use radiation-free MR imaging to correct for the effects of cardio-respiratory motion in the PET data, improving qualitative and quantitative PET imaging in the heart. The purpose of this study was (i) to implement a MR image-based motion-corrected PET/MR method and (ii) to perform a proof-of-concept study of quantitative myocardial PET data in patients. The proposed method takes reconstructions of respiratory and cardiac gated PET data and applies spatial transformations to a single reference frame before averaging to form a single motion-corrected PET (MC-PET) image. Motion vector fields (MVFs) describing the transformations were derived from affine or non-rigid registration of respiratory and cardiac gated MR data. Eight patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis underwent cardiac PET/MR imaging after injection of 5 MBq kg−1 of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). Myocardial regions affected by motion were identified by expert readers within which target-to-background ratios (TBR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were measured on non-MC-non-gated, MC-PET, and double respiratory and cardiac gated PET images. Paired t-tests were used to determine statistical differences in quantitative uptake-measures between the different types of PET images. MC-PET images showed less blurring compared to non-MC-non-gated PET and tracer activity qualitatively aligned better with the underlying myocardial anatomy when fused with MR. TBR and CNR were significantly greater for MC-PET (2.8  ±  0.9; 21  ±  22) compared to non-MC-non-gated PET (2.4  ±  0.9, p  =  0.0001; 15  ±  13, p  =  0.02), while TBR was lower and CNR greater compared to double-gated PET (3.2  ±  0.9, p  =  0.04; 6  ±  3, p  =  0.004). This study demonstrated in a patient cohort that motion-corrected (MC) cardiac PET/MR is feasible using a retrospective MR image-based method and that improvement in TBR and CNR are achievable. MC PET/MR holds promise for improving interpretation and quantification in cardiac PET imaging.

[1]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Motion-corrected whole-heart PET-MR for the simultaneous visualisation of coronary artery integrity and myocardial viability: an initial clinical validation , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  Benjamin M W Tsui,et al.  Dual respiratory and cardiac motion estimation in PET imaging: Methods design and quantitative evaluation , 2018, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Ouyang,et al.  MR-based motion correction for cardiac PET parametric imaging: a simulation study , 2018, EJNMMI Physics.

[4]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Motion‐corrected simultaneous cardiac positron emission tomography and coronary MR angiography with high acquisition efficiency , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  V. Fuster,et al.  Nuclear cardiology in the literature: A selection of recent, original research papers , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Impact of motion compensation and partial volume correction for 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging of coronary plaque , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Jing Tang,et al.  MRI‐assisted dual motion correction for myocardial perfusion defect detection in PET imaging , 2017, Medical physics.

[8]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative PET image reconstruction employing nested expectation-maximization deconvolution for motion compensation , 2017, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[9]  Thierry Blu,et al.  MR‐based respiratory and cardiac motion correction for PET imaging , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Y. Rakvongthai,et al.  Magnetic Resonance-based Motion Correction for Quantitative PET in Simultaneous PET-MR Imaging. , 2017, PET clinics.

[11]  D. Dey,et al.  Motion-Corrected Imaging of the Aortic Valve with 18F-NaF PET/CT and PET/MRI: A Feasibility Study , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  V. Fuster,et al.  Clinical Utility of Combined FDG-PET/MR to Assess Myocardial Disease. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  Tobias Schaeffter,et al.  Cardiac and Respiratory Motion Correction for Simultaneous Cardiac PET/MR , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  A. Ha,et al.  Reply: Treatment Nuances in Cardiac Sarcoidosis. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  N. Alpert,et al.  Impact of motion and partial volume effects correction on PET myocardial perfusion imaging using simultaneous PET-MR , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary Artery PET/MR Imaging: Feasibility, Limitations, and Solutions. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[17]  Tobias Schaeffter,et al.  MR-Based Cardiac and Respiratory Motion-Compensation Techniques for PET-MR Imaging. , 2016, PET clinics.

[18]  Harald H Quick,et al.  Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  A. Ha,et al.  Cardiac Sarcoidosis. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Damini Dey,et al.  Dual-Gated Motion-Frozen Cardiac PET with Flurpiridaz F 18 , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  I. Sarikaya Cardiac applications of PET , 2015, Nuclear medicine communications.

[22]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Valvular (18)F-Fluoride and (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake Predict Disease Progression and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Dweck,et al.  Risk Stratification in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Using Novel Imaging Approaches , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[24]  E. Warburton,et al.  Identifying active vascular microcalcification by 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography , 2015, Nature Communications.

[25]  Holger Schmidt,et al.  Reconstruction-Incorporated Respiratory Motion Correction in Clinical Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging for Oncology Applications , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Motion correction options in PET/MRI. , 2015, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[27]  Jeremy N. Skepper,et al.  Identifying active vascular microcalcification by 18 F-sodium fluoride positron emission , 2015 .

[28]  M. Dweck,et al.  18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[29]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Magnetic resonance-based motion correction for positron emission tomography imaging. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[30]  M. Dweck,et al.  Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  C Tsoumpas,et al.  Analysis and comparison of two methods for motion correction in PET imaging. , 2012, Medical physics.

[32]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  Motion Correction in Dual Gated Cardiac PET Using Mass-Preserving Image Registration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Tobias Schaeffter,et al.  Hierarchical adaptive local affine registration for fast and robust respiratory motion estimation , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[35]  Brian G. Choi,et al.  Positron emission tomography for the evaluation and treatment of cardiomyopathy , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Ahmed Tawakol,et al.  Feasibility of FDG imaging of the coronary arteries: comparison between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[37]  J. Wykrzykowska,et al.  Imaging of Inflamed and Vulnerable Plaque in Coronary Arteries with 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Suppression of Myocardial Uptake Using a Low-Carbohydrate, High-Fat Preparation , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  J. Carr,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 3.0 T: Comparison With Steady-State Free Precession Technique at 1.5 T , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[39]  A J Reader,et al.  List-mode-based reconstruction for respiratory motion correction in PET using non-rigid body transformations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  John W. Clark,et al.  A motion-incorporated reconstruction method for gated PET studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Lei Xing,et al.  Model-based image reconstruction for four-dimensional PET. , 2006, Medical physics.

[42]  A. Freiman,et al.  Association of vascular 18F-FDG uptake with vascular calcification. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  C. J. Thompson,et al.  Motion correction of PET images using multiple acquisition frames , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  R. Huesman,et al.  Non-rigid summing of gated PET via optical flow , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[45]  H. Fleming Cardiac sarcoidosis. , 1986, Clinics in dermatology.