Boundary Element Methods for Inductive Hardening

This study deals with the simulation of inductive hardening of conducting workpieces made of steel. The aim is to calculate the propagation of heat in the workpiece. Based on this knowledge, the hardened zone can be predicted with sufficient precision. Since the simulation is to be applied in industry, workpieces and inductors are supposed to have a complex three dimensional shape. The electromagnetic calculations are based on the quasi-static approximation of Maxwell’s equations in frequency domain, and the non-linear heat conduction equation is used to evaluate the temperature distribution. The focus of this treatise is on the computation of the electromagnetic fields, especially on the boundary element methods (BEM) applied in order to master the unbounded exterior of the conductors. In the interior of the conductors, the skin effect plays an important role and the electromagnetic fields show a rapid decay. If the numerical solution is to resolve this effect, the mesh must be very fine at the surface, whereas this is not necessary elsewhere. To save storage, the mesh is refined adaptively in the interior, with the aid of a residual based error estimator. The equations for the conducting region are solved using a finite element method (FEM). A hierarchical system of three models is presented for the coupling of the BEM equations for the exterior with the FEM equations for the interior. The eddy current approach is the model with the most convenient properties. The FEM/BEM coupling is strong and symmetric, the equations have a unique solution, and the convergence of an iterative solver can be guaranteed. There is also a quasi-optimal a priori error etimate for a conforming Garlerkin discretization based on edge elements and Raviart-Thomas elements. However in terms of implementation the eddy current approach is also the most complicated one. The impedance model can be used as an approximation. It is based on the same equations for the two regions but in this model the coupling is realized only weakly by imposing so-called impedance boundary conditions on the surface of the conductors. The weak coupling has the advantage that the BEM and FEM parts can be solved independently. In order to get a first rough estimate of the electromagnetic fields, the magnetostatic approach is developed. As far as the BEM computations are concerned it assumes the negligible penetration depth of a perfect conductor and the FEM/BEM parts are coupled only uni-directionally. A kind of scalar magnetic potential is used in all three models, and in regions with nontrivial topology they are multivalued. In that case, the jumps of the magnetic potentials at suitable cutting surfaces or cutting cycles are associated with the total currents in the conductors, these surfaces or cycles must be added to the meshes. For this purpose, an algorithm for the automatic construction and classification of generators of H1(Γh, Z ) for triangulated surfaces is introduced. Unlike the FEM matrices, the BEM matrices are dense and cannot be stored completely. A H-Matrix Approximation is applied on the four utilized kernels of elaborate structure. Analytical solutions are developed to verify the electromagnetic computations. The non-linear heat problem is solved with an implicit Euler method. Measurements of the surface temperature during the process are made for the validation of these calculations. Comparisons of the predicted hardened zone in the simulation with real hardened items are most important for the program’s verification.

[1]  I N Bronstein,et al.  Taschenbuch der Mathematik , 1966 .

[2]  L. Gong,et al.  3-D inhomogeneous induction heating of a shell , 1993, Conference Record of the 1993 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Twenty-Eighth IAS Annual Meeting.

[3]  M. Saunders,et al.  Solution of Sparse Indefinite Systems of Linear Equations , 1975 .

[4]  Stefan A. Sauter Variable order panel clustering (extended version) , 1999 .

[5]  G. Temple Static and Dynamic Electricity , 1940, Nature.

[6]  P. Grisvard Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains , 1985 .

[7]  Ralf Hiptmair,et al.  Modelling and Simulation of Induction Heating , 2000 .

[8]  Eduard L. Stiefel,et al.  Einführung in die numerische Mathematik , 1962 .

[9]  Alain Bossavit,et al.  On the Lorenz gauge , 1999 .

[10]  H. K. Dirks,et al.  Quasi-stationary fields for microelectronic applications , 1996 .

[11]  C. DeWitt-Morette,et al.  Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology , 1990 .

[12]  Arnulf Kost,et al.  Numerische Methoden in der Berechnung elektromagnetischer Felder , 1994 .

[13]  W. Hackbusch,et al.  H 2 -matrix approximation of integral operators by interpolation , 2002 .

[14]  Jacques Rappaz,et al.  Boundary-element method yields external vector potentials in complex industrial applications , 1997 .

[15]  Patrick Ciarlet,et al.  On traces for functional spaces related to Maxwell's equations Part I: An integration by parts formula in Lipschitz polyhedra , 2001 .

[16]  Peter Monk,et al.  Analysis of a finite element method for Maxwell's equations , 1992 .

[17]  P. Steerenberg,et al.  Targeting pathophysiological rhythms: prednisone chronotherapy shows sustained efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  R. Unbehauen,et al.  On the 3-D inhomogeneous induction heating of a shell , 1994 .

[19]  J. Stoer Einfiihrung in die numerische mathematik i , 1972 .

[20]  M. Świerkosz,et al.  Numerical simulation of induction heating processes. , 1992 .

[21]  W. Hackbusch,et al.  On H2-Matrices , 2000 .

[22]  P. Kolditz,et al.  Computational Methods in Environmental Fluid Mechanics , 2002, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[23]  W. Nolting Grundkurs theoretische Physik , 2002 .

[24]  M. Holzinger,et al.  The finite element method in heat transfer analysis , 1997 .

[25]  Ursula van Rienen,et al.  Numerical Methods in Computational Electrodynamics - Linear Systems in Practical Applications , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering.

[26]  A. Bossavit The computation of eddy-currents, in dimension 3, by using mixed finite elements and boundary elements in association , 1991 .

[27]  Klaus Weltner Mathematik für Physiker , 1995 .

[28]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[29]  A Scalar BEM for Time Harmonic Eddy Current Problems with Impedance Boundary Conditions , 2001 .

[30]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[31]  Rémy Glardon,et al.  Numerical modelling of induction heating of long workpieces , 1994 .

[32]  Ralf Hiptmair,et al.  Symmetric Coupling for Eddy Current Problems , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[33]  Habib Ammari,et al.  A Justification of Eddy Currents Model for the Maxwell Equations , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[34]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Residual based a posteriori error estimators for eddy current computation , 2000 .

[35]  M. Reißel On a transmission boundary-value problem for the time-harmonic Maxwell equations without displacement currents , 1993 .

[36]  K. Preis,et al.  Gauged Current Vector Potential and Reentrant Corners in the FEM Analysis of 3D , 2003 .

[37]  Henk A. van der Vorst,et al.  Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Converging Variant of Bi-CG for the Solution of Nonsymmetric Linear Systems , 1992, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[38]  W. Hackbusch,et al.  On the fast matrix multiplication in the boundary element method by panel clustering , 1989 .

[39]  M. Costabel,et al.  Singularities of Maxwell interface problems , 1999 .

[40]  Christophe Hazard,et al.  A Singular Field Method for the Solution of Maxwell's Equations in Polyhedral Domains , 1999, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[41]  K. Atkinson,et al.  Theoretical Numerical Analysis: A Functional Analysis Framework , 2001 .