Deformable Surface Accommodating Intraocular Lens: Second Generation Prototype Design Methodology and Testing.

PURPOSE Present an analysis methodology for developing and evaluating accommodating intraocular lenses incorporating a deformable interface. METHODS The next generation design of extruded gel interface intraocular lens is presented. A prototype based upon similar previously in vivo proven design was tested with measurements of actuation force, lens power, interface contour, optical transfer function, and visual Strehl ratio. Prototype verified mathematical models were used to optimize optical and mechanical design parameters to maximize the image quality and minimize the required force to accommodate. RESULTS The prototype lens produced adequate image quality with the available physiologic accommodating force. The iterative mathematical modeling based upon the prototype yielded maximized optical and mechanical performance through maximum allowable gel thickness to extrusion diameter ratio, maximum feasible refractive index change at the interface, and minimum gel material properties in Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus. CONCLUSIONS The design prototype performed well. It operated within the physiologic constraints of the human eye including the force available for full accommodative amplitude using the eye's natural focusing feedback, while maintaining image quality in the space available. The parameters that optimized optical and mechanical performance were delineated as those, which minimize both asphericity and actuation pressure. The design parameters outlined herein can be used as a template to maximize the performance of a deformable interface intraocular lens. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE The article combines a multidisciplinary basic science approach from biomechanics, optical science, and ophthalmology to optimize an intraocular lens design suitable for preliminary animal trials.

[1]  Jorge L. Alió,et al.  Feasibility and development of a high‐power real accommodating intraocular lens , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Wilhelm Stork,et al.  Imaging quality of intraocular lenses , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  On Contrast Sensitivity in an Image Difference Model , 2002, PICS.

[5]  J. Movshon,et al.  Analysis of the development of spatial contrast sensitivity in monkey and human infants. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  Francis Heed Adler,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the eye;: Clinical application , 1976 .

[7]  Derek Nankivil,et al.  Age-dependence of the optomechanical responses of ex vivo human lenses from India and the USA, and the force required to produce these in a lens stretcher: The similarity to in vivo disaccommodation , 2011, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Alarcón,et al.  Long‐term reading performance in patients with bilateral dual‐optic accommodating intraocular lenses , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  Hannah E. Smithson,et al.  Accounting for the phase, spatial frequency and orientation demands of the task improves metrics based on the visual Strehl ratio , 2013, Vision Research.

[10]  T. D. Duane,et al.  Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology , 1993 .

[11]  C. Schor,et al.  Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.