First-line treatment of advanced breast cancer with sunitinib in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone: results of a prospective, randomized phase III study.

PURPOSE To investigate whether sunitinib plus docetaxel improves clinical outcomes for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) versus docetaxel alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase III study, patients were randomly assigned to open-label combination therapy (sunitinib 37.5 mg/d, days 2 to 15 every 3 weeks; and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 every 3 weeks) or monotherapy (docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-six patients were randomly assigned to combination therapy, and 297 patients were assigned to monotherapy. Median PFS times were 8.6 and 8.3 months with combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.92; one-sided P = .265). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher with the combination (55%) than with monotherapy (42%; one-sided P = .001). Duration of response was similar in both arms (7.5 months with the combination v 7.2 months with monotherapy). Median overall survival (OS) times were 24.8 and 25.5 months with combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (one-sided P = .904). There were 107 deaths with the combination and 91 deaths with monotherapy. The frequency of common adverse events (AEs) was higher with the combination, as were treatment discontinuations caused by AEs. CONCLUSION The combination of sunitinib plus docetaxel improved ORR but did not prolong either PFS or OS compared with docetaxel alone when given to an unselected HER2/neu-negative cohort as first-line treatment for ABC. Sunitinib combination therapy may also have resulted in AEs that yield an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. The sunitinib-docetaxel regimen evaluated in this study is not recommended for further use in ABC.

[1]  N. Robert,et al.  Sunitinib plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label trial. , 2011, Clinical breast cancer.

[2]  Xian Zhou,et al.  RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Bergh,et al.  Abstract P6-12-05: Ways To Understand Mechanism of Action for Targeted Drugs? Gene Expression Analyses from Paired Biopsies in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in a Substudy from the Randomized Study Docetaxel +/− Sunitinib A6181064 , 2010 .

[4]  Arlene Chan,et al.  Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  K. Kern,et al.  Phase III trial of sunitinib (SU) in combination with capecitabine (C) versus C in previously treated advanced breast cancer (ABC). , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Gray,et al.  A meta-analysis of overall survival data from three randomized trials of bevacizumab (BV) and first-line chemotherapy as treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). , 2010 .

[7]  H. Iwata,et al.  Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[8]  Xin Huang,et al.  Overall Survival and Updated Results for Sunitinib Compared With Interferon Alfa in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Bergh,et al.  Prognostic significance of stromal platelet-derived growth factor beta-receptor expression in human breast cancer. , 2009, The American journal of pathology.

[10]  John M L Ebos,et al.  Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[11]  Masahiro Inoue,et al.  Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[12]  Sonja Loges,et al.  Silencing or fueling metastasis with VEGF inhibitors: antiangiogenesis revisited. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[13]  J. Bergh,et al.  Sequential administration of sunitinib (SU) and docetaxel (D) in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC): an exploratory evaluation , 2008 .

[14]  F. Wenz,et al.  The influence of the interval between IORT during breast-conserving surgery and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on late toxicity , 2008 .

[15]  H. Rugo,et al.  Phase II study of sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Mechanisms of Disease: angiogenesis and the management of breast cancer , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[18]  H. Mouridsen,et al.  Phase III trial comparing three doses of docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  C. Henderson Controversies in the management of metastatic breast cancer , 2006 .

[20]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Macrophages promote the invasion of breast carcinoma cells via a colony-stimulating factor-1/epidermal growth factor paracrine loop. , 2005, Cancer research.

[21]  P Kelly Marcom,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J. Inazawa,et al.  Correlation of KIT and EGFR overexpression with invasive ductal breast carcinoma of the solid‐tubular subtype, nuclear grade 3, and mesenchymal or myoepithelial differentiation , 2005, Cancer Science.

[23]  N. Pryer,et al.  Preclinical evaluation of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11248 as a single agent and in combination with "standard of care" therapeutic agents for the treatment of breast cancer. , 2003, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[24]  D. Kwiatkowski Rhebbing up mTOR: New Insights on TSC1 and TSC2, and the Pathogenesis of Tuberous Sclerosis , 2003, Cancer biology & therapy.

[25]  N. Pryer,et al.  SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. , 2003, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[26]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  L. Berlin,et al.  Standard of care. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  J. Bergh Quo vadis with targeted drugs in the 21st century? , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  N. Pryer,et al.  SU11248 inhibits tumor growth and CSF-1R-dependent osteolysis in an experimental breast cancer bone metastasis model , 2004, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[30]  Juthamas Sukbuntherng,et al.  In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[31]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.