[The effect of body position on the results of central and paracentral rebound tonometry].

PURPOSE This study analyzes the fluctuations of intraocular pressure (IOP) and clarifies the error of paracentral rebound tonometry associated with change in body position. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 45 healthy volunteers aged 25.4±2.1 years. First we performed rebound tonometry in the sitting position in the center of the cornea and 3-4 mm from the temporal and nasal sides (Icare-c, Icare-n, Icare-t, respectively) and bidirectional applanation tonometry (IOPcc - corneal compensated, IOPg - Goldmann tonometry). Then we measured Icare-c, Icare-n, Icare-t in the supine position, and after 5 minutes repeated Icare-c in the supine position. After this, we measured Icare-c, IOPcc and IOPg in the sitting position. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Initial IOPcc and IOPg were 4.6±2.8 and 14.8±2.8 mm Hg. Initial Icare-c, Icare-t, and Icare-n measurements amounted to 15.0±1.9, 15.7±1.5 and 16.3±1.3 mm Hg; in the supine position the measurements were 16.4±2.1, 17.2±1.7 and 17.1±1.9 mm Hg. Paracentral measurements differed from Icare-c in both sitting and supine positions; only between Icare-t and Icare-n measured in the supine position there were no significant differences. The results of Icare-c, Icare-t, and Icare-n in body position change were comparable. Icare-c measured after 5 minutes in the supine position increased up to 16.6±2.4 mm Hg. Final IOPcc and IOPg did not differ from the initial measurements. Final Icare-c was lower than the initial result by 0.8±0.2 mm Hg, and lower than both supine Icare-c measurements by 2.1±0.2 and 2.6±0.2 mm Hg. CONCLUSION Paracentral rebound tonometry findings exceed those of rebound tonometry in central cornea, but in body position change the alteration of measurements in the same points on the cornea are comparable. In the supine position IOP increases on average by 1.0-1.5 mm Hg compared to the sitting position.

[1]  U. Nnadozie,et al.  Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes among patients with primary open angle glaucoma in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: Any implication for management , 2022, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[2]  Marcelina Sobczak,et al.  Does body position, age, and heart rate induce IOP’s changes? , 2021, European journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  C. Chuka-Okosa,et al.  Comparing posture induced intraocular pressure variations in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. , 2021, International journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Tetsuya Yamamoto,et al.  Localization in glaucomatous visual field loss vulnerable to posture-induced intraocular pressure changes in open angle glaucoma. , 2020, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  R. Weinreb,et al.  Review of the measurement and management of 24-hour intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. , 2020, Survey of ophthalmology.

[6]  Eliška Najmanová,et al.  Intraocular pressure response affected by changing of sitting and supine positions , 2019, Acta ophthalmologica.

[7]  N. Rosa,et al.  Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer , 2019, Medicina.

[8]  Ö. Kayıkçıoğlu,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of Body Position on Intraocular Pressure Measured with Rebound Tonometer , 2019, Turkish journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Yingping Deng,et al.  Effect of body position on the pathogenesis of asymmetric primary open angle glaucoma. , 2018, International journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  E. Detorakis,et al.  Limbal rebound tonometry: clinical comparisons and applications , 2017, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[11]  F. Gao,et al.  Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer , 2017, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[12]  R. Weinreb,et al.  The Effect of Posture on Intraocular Pressure and Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters in Treated and Untreated Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. , 2017, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[13]  A. A. Antonov,et al.  [Intraocular pressure measurement inside the anterior chamber: a new technical solution and results]. , 2016, Vestnik oftalmologii.

[14]  E. Atalay,et al.  Posture-induced changes in intraocular pressure: comparison of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma , 2014, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  James V. M. Hanson,et al.  Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions , 2013, BMC Ophthalmology.

[16]  Benjamin J. Coldrick,et al.  Does Rebound Tonometry Probe Misalignment Modify Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Human Eyes? , 2013, Journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  N. Ehlers,et al.  Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer – Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[18]  R. Ritch,et al.  Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. , 2010, Survey of ophthalmology.

[19]  A. Lam,et al.  The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[20]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  Technical Note: A comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[22]  M. Iliev,et al.  Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[23]  C. Riva,et al.  Posture changes and subfoveal choroidal blood flow. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  S. Asrani,et al.  Large Diurnal Fluctuations in Intraocular Pressure Are an Independent Risk Factor in Patients With Glaucoma , 2000, Journal of glaucoma.

[25]  V. Lee,et al.  Tono-Pen tonometer and corneal thickness , 1999, Eye.

[26]  M. Whitacre,et al.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. , 1993, Survey of ophthalmology.

[27]  S. Tsukahara,et al.  Postural change of IOP in normal persons and in patients with primary wide open-angle glaucoma and low-tension glaucoma. , 1984, The British journal of ophthalmology.