Environmental policy, management and R&D

The authors would like to thank Chris Heady (OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs) and Dirk Pilat (OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry) for valuable comments on an earlier draft of the paper. In addition, the contributions from all of our colleagues on the OECD Project on “Environmental Policy and Firm-Level Management” are gratefully acknowledged. (See Johnstone 2006 for a full list of contributors and other outputs from the project.) In particular the insights of Toshi Arimura (Department of Economics, Sophia University, Japan) in the area of research and development have been extremely valuable.

[1]  William A. Pizer,et al.  Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is Endogenous , 2003 .

[2]  Scott Milliman,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply , 1992 .

[3]  Ian W. H. Parry,et al.  Pollution Regulation and the Efficiency Gains from Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[5]  Stephen Martin,et al.  Advanced Industrial Economics , 1994 .

[6]  Schmidt-Hebbel Klaus,et al.  Economic policy reforms Going for growth , 2009 .

[7]  John T. Scott.  Schumpeterian competition and environmental R&D , 1997 .

[8]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology , 1996 .

[9]  C. Schultze,et al.  POLLUTION, PRICES, AND PUBLIC POLICY , 1977 .

[10]  Luiz de Mello,et al.  Boosting Innovation Performance in Brazil , 2006 .

[11]  Paul Geroski,et al.  INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY, AND MARKET STRUCTURE , 1990 .

[12]  Andrew Tylecote,et al.  Corporate Governance, Innovation Systems and Industrial Performance , 1999 .

[13]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[14]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[15]  FlRM SlZE.  INNOVATION, FIRM SIZE AND MARKET STRUCTURE: SCHUMPETERIAN HYPOTHESES AND SOME NEW THEMES , 1996 .

[16]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[17]  John Hicks,et al.  The Theory of Wages , 1933 .

[18]  A. Marin,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Comment☆ , 1991 .

[19]  S. Ahmad.  ON THE THEORY OF INDUCED INNOVATION , 1966 .

[20]  Lloyd Orr,et al.  Incentive for Innovation as the Basis for Effluent Charge Strategy , 1976 .

[21]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[22]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[23]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change , 1998 .

[24]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations , 1977 .

[25]  Lawrence J. White,et al.  Innovation in pollution control , 1986 .

[26]  Douglas C. Lippoldt,et al.  International Licensing and the Strengthening of Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries , 2004 .

[27]  A. Link.  Productivity growth, environmental regulations and the composition of R&D. , 1982 .

[28]  N. Pain,et al.  An Overview of Public Policies to Support Innovation , 2005 .

[29]  Chiara Criscuolo,et al.  Global Engagement and the Innovation Activities of Firms , 2005 .

[30]  Tadashi Yokoyama,et al.  Upgrading Japan's Innovation System to Sustain Economic Growth , 2006 .

[31]  Smita B. Brunnermeier,et al.  Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[32]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size , 1987 .

[33]  Chulho Jung,et al.  Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives , 1996 .

[34]  John T. Scott.  Environmental Research and Development , 2003 .

[35]  D. Jorgenson.  The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. , 1963 .

[36]  P. Noord,et al.  Social Safety Nets and Structural Adjustment , 2006 .

[37]  A. Reindl,et al.  Raising Economic Performance by Fostering Product Market Competition in Germany , 2006 .

[38]  G. Nicoletti,et al.  Taxation, Business Environment and FDI Location in OECD Countries , 2006 .

[39]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[40]  G. Symeonidis,et al.  Innovation, firm size and market structure , 1996 .

[41]  N. Pain,et al.  From Ideas to Development: The Determinants of R&D and Patenting , 2005 .

[42]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Te , 1995 .

[43]  Randall S. Jones,et al.  Strengthening the Integration of Japan in the World Economy to Benefit more Fully from Globalisation , 2006 .

[44]  Kornelius Kraft,et al.  Market Structure, Firm Characteristics and Innovative Activity , 1989 .

[45]  Stefan Ambec,et al.  When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green , 2007 .

[46]  F. Crespi.  Notes on the Determinants of Innovation: A Multi-Perspective Analysis , 2004 .

[47]  Juan-Pablo Montero,et al.  Permits, Standards and Technology Innovation , 2002 .

[48]  C. Fischer,et al.  How Large are the Welfare Gains from Technological Innovation Induced by Environmental Policies? , 2003 .

[49]  Paul Lanoie,et al.  Des billets verts pour des entreprises agricoles vertes , 2007, Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement.

[50]  N. Johnstone.  Environmental Policy and Corporate Behaviour , 2007 .

[51]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  Self-Financing of an R & D Project , 1976 .

[52]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[53]  John T. Scott.  Environmental Research and Development: Us Industrial Research, the Clean Air Act and Environmental Damage , 2003 .

[54]  Suzi Kerr,et al.  Policy-Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown , 2001 .

[55]  Paul Lanoie,et al.  Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis , 2011 .

[56]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .

[57]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Technological Change and the Environment , 2000 .

[58]  V. Valencia.  Corporate Governance and Innovation , 2007 .