Self-Reliant Rover Design for Increasing Mission Productivity

Achieving consistently high levels of productivity has been a challenge for Mars surface missions. While the rovers have made major discoveries and dramatically increased our understanding of Mars, they often require a great deal of effort from the operations teams, and achieving mission objectives can take longer than anticipated. The objective of this work is to identify changes to flight software and ground operations that enable high levels of productivity with reduced reliance on ground interactions. This will enable the development of Self-Reliant Rovers: rovers that make use of high-level guidance from operators to select their own situational activities and respond to unexpected conditions, all without dependence on ground intervention. In this paper we describe the system we are developing and illustrate how it enables increased mission productivity.

[1]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Terrain Adaptive Navigation for planetary rovers , 2009, J. Field Robotics.

[2]  Mark Woods,et al.  Autonomous science for an ExoMars Rover–like mission , 2009, J. Field Robotics.

[3]  Ryan Mackey,et al.  Productivity challenges for Mars rover operations , 2016 .

[4]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Incremental sampling-based motion planners using policy iteration methods , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[5]  Alonzo Kelly,et al.  Autonomous robot navigation using advanced motion primitives , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[6]  Amol Dattatraya Mali,et al.  Expressing User Intent in Planning by Instance Rewriting , 2016, 2016 IEEE 28th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI).

[7]  Tara A. Estlin,et al.  Oasis: Onboard autonomous science investigation system for opportunistic rover science , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[8]  Debarati Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Mars Science Laboratory Supratactical Process , 2014 .

[9]  David R. Thompson,et al.  Science Autonomy for Rover Subsurface Exploration of the Atacama Desert , 2014, AI Mag..

[10]  C. Geib,et al.  An Introduction to Plan , Activity , and Intent Recognition , 2013 .

[11]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  Smart cameras for remote science survey , 2012 .

[12]  Andrew Howard,et al.  Real-time stereo visual odometry for autonomous ground vehicles , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  T. Estlin,et al.  AEGIS autonomous targeting for ChemCam on Mars Science Laboratory: Deployment and results of initial science team use , 2017, Science Robotics.

[14]  Larry Matthies,et al.  Stereo vision and rover navigation software for planetary exploration , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[15]  Anthony Stentz Optimal and Efficient Path Planning for Unknown and Dynamic Environments , 1993 .

[16]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Multi-modal image registration for localization in Titan's atmosphere , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Claire Vallat,et al.  Activity-Based Scheduling of Science Campaigns for the Rosetta Orbiter , 2015, IJCAI.

[18]  Valerie L. Shalin,et al.  Communicating Intent for Planning and Scheduling Tasks , 2005 .

[19]  Masahiro Ono,et al.  SPOC: Deep Learning-based Terrain Classification for Mars Rover Missions , 2016 .

[20]  Mark Woods,et al.  PRoViScout: a planetary scouting rover demonstrator , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Gregg Rabideau,et al.  Prototyping an Onboard Scheduler for the Mars 2020 Rover , 2017 .

[22]  Ryan Mackey,et al.  Model-based approach to rover health assessment for increased productivity , 2017, 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference.