The Influence of a Network's Spatial Symmetry, Topological Dimension, and Density on Its Percolation Threshold

Analyses of the processes of information transfer within network structures shows that the conductivity and percolation threshold of the network depend not only on its density (average number of links per node), but also on its spatial symmetry groups and topological dimension. The results presented in this paper regarding conductivity simulation in network structures show that, for regular and random 2D and 3D networks, an increase in the number of links (density) per node reduces their percolation threshold value. At the same network density, the percolation threshold value is less for 3D than for 2D networks, whatever their structure and symmetry may be. Regardless of the type of networks and their symmetry, transition from 2D to 3D structures engenders a change of percolation threshold by a value exp{−(d − 1)} that is invariant for transition between structures, for any kind of network (d being topological dimension). It is observed that in 2D or 3D networks, which can be mutually transformed by deformation without breaking and forming new links, symmetry of similarity is observed, and the networks have the same percolation threshold. The presence of symmetry axes and corresponding number of symmetry planes in which they lie affects the percolation threshold value. For transition between orders of symmetry axes, in the presence of the corresponding planes of symmetry, an invariant exists which contributes to the percolation threshold value. Inversion centers also influence the value of the percolation threshold. Moreover, the greater the number of pairs of elements of the structure which have inversion, the more they contribute to the fraction of the percolation threshold in the presence of such a center of symmetry. However, if the center of symmetry lies in the plane of mirror symmetry separating the layers of the 3D structure, the mutual presence of this group of symmetry elements do not affect the percolation threshold value. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is that for different network structures, it was shown that the percolation threshold for the blocking of nodes problem could be represented as an additive set of invariant values, that is, as an algebraic sum, the value of the members of which is stored in the transition from one structure to another. The invariant values are network density, topological dimension, and some of the elements of symmetry (axes of symmetry and the corresponding number of symmetry planes in which they lie, centers of inversion).

[1]  O. Biham,et al.  Distribution of shortest path lengths in subcritical Erdős-Rényi networks. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[2]  M. Sahini,et al.  Applications of Percolation Theory , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[3]  Galam,et al.  Universal formulas for percolation thresholds. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  Klaus Mecke,et al.  Topological estimation of percolation thresholds , 2007, 0708.3251.

[5]  John C. Wierman,et al.  The critical manifolds of inhomogeneous bond percolation on bow-tie and checkerboard lattices , 2012, 1210.6609.

[6]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Monte Carlo Estimates of Percolation Probabilities for Various Lattices , 1962 .

[7]  Percolation in networks with voids and bottlenecks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  J. W. Essam,et al.  Exact Critical Percolation Probabilities for Site and Bond Problems in Two Dimensions , 1964 .

[9]  P. D. Val The Theory and Applications of Harmonic Integrals , 1941, Nature.

[10]  С. А. Лесько,et al.  Стохастические и перколяционные модели динамики блокировки вычислительных сетей при распространении эпидемий эволюционирующих компьютерных вирусов , 2019 .

[11]  Franco Bagnoli,et al.  Percolation and Internet Science , 2019, Future Internet.

[12]  Mechanisms and Geochemical Models of Core Formation , 2015, 1504.05417.

[13]  A. V. Shubnikov,et al.  Symmetry in Science and Art , 1974 .

[14]  V. A. Krasnov ALGEBRAIC CYCLES ON A REAL ALGEBRAIC GM-MANIFOLD AND THEIR APPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[15]  J. W. Essam,et al.  Some Exact Critical Percolation Probabilities for Bond and Site Problems in Two Dimensions , 1963 .

[16]  Monte Carlo solution of bond percolation processes in various crystal lattices , 1962 .

[17]  Yilun Shang,et al.  Modeling epidemic spread with awareness and heterogeneous transmission rates in networks , 2013, Journal of biological physics.

[18]  D. Gross,et al.  The role of symmetry in fundamental physics. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Shang Yi-Lun Local Natural Connectivity in Complex Networks , 2011 .

[20]  José S. Andrade,et al.  . Characterizing the intrinsic correlations of scale-free networks , 2015, ArXiv.

[21]  Topology invariance in percolation thresholds , 1998, cond-mat/9812383.

[22]  Professor Dr. Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  Computer Simulation and Computer Algebra , 1993, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[23]  J. Nye Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices , 1957 .

[24]  Yi Zhao,et al.  Robustness and percolation of holes in complex networks , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[25]  P. N. Timonin Statistical mechanics of high-density bond percolation. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[26]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Percolation Theory and Network Modeling Applications in Soil Physics , 1998 .

[27]  Yilun Shang,et al.  Vulnerability of networks: fractional percolation on random graphs. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Xiaoming Xu,et al.  Percolation of a general network of networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Anastasia G. Zaltcman,et al.  Managing social networks: Applying the percolation theory methodology to understand individuals' attitudes and moods , 2017 .

[30]  Jesper Lykke Jacobsen,et al.  High-precision percolation thresholds and Potts-model critical manifolds from graph polynomials , 2014, 1401.7847.

[31]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Percolation Processes and Related Topics , 1963 .

[32]  Toshihiro Tanizawa,et al.  Robustness analysis of bimodal networks in the whole range of degree correlation , 2016, Physical review. E.

[33]  K. Wilson Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena. I. Renormalization Group and the Kadanoff Scaling Picture , 1971 .

[34]  D. E. Aspnes,et al.  Static Phenomena Near Critical Points: Theory and Experiment , 1967 .

[35]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[36]  A. Cracknell,et al.  The mathematical theory of symmetry in solids;: Representation theory for point groups and space groups, , 1972 .

[37]  Yilun Shang Unveiling robustness and heterogeneity through percolation triggered by random-link breakdown. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.