The Expected 30-Year Benefits of Early Versus Delayed Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease by Lipid Lowering

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Lipid-lowering recommendations for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease rely principally on estimated 10-year risk. We sought to determine the optimal time for initiation of lipid lowering in younger adults as a function of expected 30-year benefit. Methods: Data from 3148 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009–2016) participants, age 30 to 59 years, not eligible for lipid-lowering treatment recommendation under the most recent US guidelines, were analyzed. We estimated the absolute and relative impact of lipid lowering as a function of age, age at initiation, and non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level on the expected rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease over the succeeding 30 years. We modeled expected risk reductions based on shorter-term effects observed in statin trials (model A) and longer-term benefits based on Mendelian randomization studies (model B). Results: In both models, potential reductions in predicted 30-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk were greater with older age and higher non–HDL-C level. Immediate initiation of lipid lowering (ie, treatment for 30 years) in 40- to 49-year-old patients with non–HDL-C ≥160 mg/dL would be expected to reduce their average predicted 30-year risk of 17.1% to 11.6% (model A; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 5.5%) or 6.5% (model B; ARR 10.6%). Delaying lipid lowering by 10 years (treatment for 20 years) would result in residual 30-year risk of 12.7% (A; ARR 4.4) or 9.9% (B; ARR 7.2%) and delaying by 20 years (treatment for 10 years) would lead to expected mean residual risk of 14.6% (A; ARR 2.6%) or 13.9% (B; ARR 3.2%). The slope of the achieved ARR as a function of delay in treatment was also higher with older age and higher non–HDL-C level. Conclusions: Substantial reduction in expected atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in the next 30 years is achievable by intensive lipid lowering in individuals in their 40s and 50s with non–HDL-C ≥160 mg/dL. For many, the question of when to start lipid lowering might be more relevant than whether to start lipid lowering.

[1]  B. Nordestgaard,et al.  2019 vs. 2016 ESC/EAS statin guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. , 2020, European heart journal.

[2]  R. Krauss,et al.  Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: pathophysiological, genetic, and therapeutic insights: a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel , 2020, European heart journal.

[3]  A. Keech,et al.  Intensive LDL cholesterol-lowering treatment beyond current recommendations for the prevention of major vascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials including 327 037 participants. , 2020, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[4]  M. Pencina,et al.  Apolipoprotein B Particles and Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review. , 2019, JAMA cardiology.

[5]  M. Pencina,et al.  Trajectories of Non-HDL Cholesterol Across Midlife: Implications for Cardiovascular Prevention. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2019, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[7]  Lale Tokgözoğlu,et al.  Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel , 2017, European heart journal.

[8]  Peter Sandercock,et al.  Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy , 2016, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Borén,et al.  The central role of arterial retention of cholesterol-rich apolipoprotein-B-containing lipoproteins in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a triumph of simplicity , 2016, Current opinion in lipidology.

[10]  M. Pencina,et al.  Age and Cardiovascular Risk Attributable to Apolipoprotein B, Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol or Non‐High‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[11]  M. Pencina,et al.  Risk of Premature Cardiovascular Disease vs the Number of Premature Cardiovascular Events. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[12]  M. Pencina,et al.  Individualized Statin Benefit for Determining Statin Eligibility in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease , 2016, Circulation.

[13]  H. Soran,et al.  Cholesterol, not just cardiovascular risk, is important in deciding who should receive statin treatment. , 2015, European heart journal.

[14]  Michael J. Pencina,et al.  Predicting the 30-Year Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The Framingham Heart Study , 2009, Circulation.

[15]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55 000 vascular deaths , 2007, The Lancet.

[16]  N J Wald,et al.  Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  W D Wagner,et al.  A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. , 1995, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[18]  R. Levy,et al.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. , 1972, Clinical chemistry.