Monitoring Prosthesis User Activity and Doffing Using an Activity Monitor and Proximity Sensors

Introduction Characterizing a prosthesis user's activity in the field may provide information relevant to his or her clinical care. The purpose of this research was to incorporate doffing and donning information into activity characterization. Materials and Methods Commercial accelerometers were positioned on the thigh and lower leg, and proximity sensors on the medial and lateral brim of the socket. A novel data-processing algorithm converted collected data into a time-stamped list of postures and activities: doffed, walking (included all types of movement), standing, and sitting. Results Controlled testing on 11 people with transtibial amputation demonstrated that activity durations and transitions between activities well matched hand notes recorded by the researcher accompanying the participant during the test. Testing on 23 participants with transtibial amputation in unrestricted field testing demonstrated that detected activities well matched participants' descriptions of activities upon return to the laboratory. At least 95% of doffs were correctly detected. Conclusions The developed technology is relevant towards the design of control systems to automatically adjust the prosthesis according to the user's activity and posture.

[1]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Validity of the prosthetic activity monitor to assess the duration and spatio-temporal characteristics of prosthetic walking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Pamela Gallagher,et al.  Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Considerations for development of sensing and monitoring tools to facilitate treatment and care of persons with lower-limb loss: a review. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Daniel C Norvell,et al.  Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: a prospective study. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  D. Potvin,et al.  Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  C. Kalbaugh,et al.  “Successful Outcome” after Below-Knee Amputation: An Objective Definition and Influence of Clinical Variables , 2008, The American surgeon.

[8]  D A Boone,et al.  Step activity monitor: long-term, continuous recording of ambulatory function. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  H. Day,et al.  The assessment and description of amputee activity , 1981, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  Maria Crotty,et al.  Use of an Activity Monitor and GPS Device to Assess Community Activity and Participation in Transtibial Amputees , 2014, Sensors.

[11]  D. Moskowitz Comparison of self-reports, reports by knowledgeable informants, and behavioral observation data , 1986 .

[12]  M Lord,et al.  Time-Dependent Behaviour of a Force-Sensitive Resistor Plantar Pressure Measurement Insole , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  Diane Potvin,et al.  Predisposing Factors Related to Prosthetic Use by People with a Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputation , 1998 .

[14]  O. John,et al.  Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Anton Filatov,et al.  Static and cyclic performance evaluation of sensors for human interface pressure measurement , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  G R Fernie,et al.  Extent of artificial limb use following rehabilitation , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  Todd Kuiken,et al.  Global Position Sensing and Step Activity as Outcome Measures of Community Mobility and Social Interaction for an Individual With a Transfemoral Amputation Due to Dysvascular Disease , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[18]  John D. Smith,et al.  Pedometer Accuracy in Persons Using Lower-Limb Prostheses , 2014 .

[19]  H. Alaranta,et al.  Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation , 1990, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[20]  S. Marshall,et al.  Skin Problems in an Amputee Clinic , 2006, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[22]  Katheryn J Allyn,et al.  How do walking, standing, and resting influence transtibial amputee residual limb fluid volume? , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  Pamela Gallagher,et al.  Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[24]  Ellen J Mackenzie,et al.  Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  Simine Vazire,et al.  The self-report method. , 2007 .

[26]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Classifying prosthetic use via accelerometry in persons with transtibial amputations. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  G. R. Fernie,et al.  An assessment of a system to monitor the activity of patients in a rehabilitation programme , 1979, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[28]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Does temporary socket removal affect residual limb fluid volume of trans-tibial amputees? , 2016, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[29]  A W Buis,et al.  Calibration problems encountered while monitoring stump/socket interface pressures with force sensing resistors: Techniques adopted to minimise inaccuracies , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[30]  Edward D. Lemaire,et al.  Improving classification of sit, stand, and lie in a smartphone human activity recognition system , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings.

[31]  J. Stepien,et al.  Activity levels among lower-limb amputees: self-report versus step activity monitor. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  D. Paulhus Measurement and control of response bias. , 1991 .

[33]  N. Dudek,et al.  Ambulation monitoring of transtibial amputation subjects with patient activity monitor versus pedometer. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  N. Ramstrand,et al.  Outcomes of a Standardized Surgical and Rehabilitation Program in Transtibial Amputation for Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2010, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.