Analogies in design decision-making

Design is becoming the decisive factor in whether a product is a commercial success, like Windows XP, or a critical failure, like Microsoft Bob. To leverage this factor we need to have a greater understanding of the cognitive processes behind Interaction Design. While there are a wide array of disciplines that fall under the umbrella of design, there are several cognitive processes that are common to all strata of design. Decision Making has been identified as an important factor in the design process but remains woefully under-explored. This paper aims to understand Design Decision-making (DDM) in the light of more recent developments in the wider decision-making field. Two studies were conducted, consisting of an initial theoretical thematic analysis to update the outdated models of design decision-making, and a follow-up quantitative study to validate the findings of the first study. Results indicate that while the current models of DDM do well to explain elements of the decision-making process they do not account for such things as the persistence of analogies across all stages of the decision-making process.

[1]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  E. Salas,et al.  Taking stock of naturalistic decision making , 2001 .

[3]  T. Connolly,et al.  The reinvention of decision making. , 1993 .

[4]  Gary Klein,et al.  Rapid Decision Making on the Fire Ground , 1986 .

[5]  Antony Tang,et al.  Design Reasoning Improves Software Design Quality , 2008, QoSA.

[6]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[7]  John S. Gero,et al.  Fixation Effects: Do They Exist in Design Problem Solving? , 1993 .

[8]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[9]  Mark S. Cohen Three paradigms for viewing decision biases , 1993 .

[10]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[11]  Andrew T. Olewnik,et al.  On Validating Engineering Design Decision Support Tools , 2005, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[12]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[13]  Raanan Lipshitz,et al.  Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. , 1993 .

[14]  Jennifer K. Phillips,et al.  A Data–Frame Theory of Sensemaking , 2007 .

[15]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers , 2007, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[16]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[18]  Jane Darke,et al.  The primary Generator and the Design Process , 1979 .

[19]  D. Hantula Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2001 .

[20]  John S. Gero,et al.  Effects of examples on the results of a design activity , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[21]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Satisficing in engineering design: causes, consequences and implications for design support , 1998 .

[22]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[23]  R. Valois,et al.  Ergonomic decision-making: a conceptual framework for experienced practitioners from backgrounds in industrial engineering and physical therapy. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[25]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[26]  Karol G. Ross,et al.  The Recognition-Primed Decision Model , 2004 .

[27]  P. Barnard,et al.  Design practice and interface usability: Evidence from interviews with designers , 1983, CHI '83.

[28]  Carmen Zannier,et al.  2 . 1 . 2 Problem Structuring & Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[29]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[30]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .