Exploring the affect factors of knowledge sharing behavior: The relations model theory perspective

With a view to achieve the ultimate goal of a permanent development, operation, and growth, to any business and enterprise, the strategy of knowledge management must be reinforced, and the sooner the better. In despite of those new and high interests shown toward the organization-embedded knowledge, not much concrete finding has been obtained regarding how and why employees are reluctant to share what they know. In our research, we proposed to base on the relations model theory to explore how different relation models, cultivated and shaped by different corporate cultures, give their influences on the willingness of knowledge sharing from employees. In the mean time, with a view to get closer to the realistic circumstance in the office, we give it a shot to include additional moderating variables, task inter-dependence, as well as time-of-cooperation, into our full research framework, aiming to see if they will disturb the influencing processes between the four principal relations and the willingness of employees to share their knowledge. The result reflects the distinct impact from communal sharing and equality matching on the willingness of sharing, while a subtle but negative impact of market pricing on the sharing willingness. There is no clear effect of authority ranking. Furthermore, in the analysis of interaction mode including additional moderators, the result has exhibited that task inter-dependence does moderate the relationship between communal sharing/equality matching/market pricing and the notion of sharing, while time-of-cooperation also adjusts the influencing processes between communal sharing, equality matching, market pricing, and willingness of sharing. This analysis and study grant us some clues regarding how corporate culture would eventually leverage employees' intention in sharing their knowledge, and advise the business organizations how they should correctly formulate the knowledge management strategy and activities to augment the knowledge inter-flows between employees.

[1]  Andy Bytheway,et al.  Business process redesign in context: an empirically derived management framework , 1998 .

[2]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Information Technology for Management , 1995 .

[3]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[4]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Peter J. van Baalen,et al.  An activity theory approach for studying the situatedness of knowledge sharing , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[7]  R. Ruggles.  The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice , 1998 .

[8]  Susan E. Morgan,et al.  Communicating about gifts of life: the effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation , 2002 .

[9]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Sharing knowledge , 2008, CACM.

[10]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[12]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[13]  D. Broadbent,et al.  On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge , 1984 .

[14]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[15]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[16]  P. Klahr,et al.  Managing Customer Support Knowledge , 1998 .

[17]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1987 .

[18]  Duncan L. Dieterly,et al.  The effect of organizational environment on perceived power and climate: A laboratory study☆ , 1974 .

[19]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  The Revolution in Employee Rewards , 1987 .

[20]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Economic progress, private values, and public policy : essays in honor of William Fellner , 1977 .

[21]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[22]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Experiential value: a hierarchical model, the impact on e-loyalty and a customer typology , 2005 .

[23]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[24]  Alan R. Heminger,et al.  Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Daniel H. Kim.  Organizing for Learning , 2001 .

[26]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Task interdependence and extrarole behavior : a test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility , 1991 .

[27]  Mary Ann Kluge.  Understanding the Essence of a Physically Active Lifestyle: A Phenomenological Study of Women 65 and Older , 2002 .

[28]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Ruth Wageman,et al.  As the Twig Is Bent: How Group Values Shape Emergent Task Interdependence in Groups , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  The combination of explicit and implicit learning processes in task control , 1987 .

[31]  A. Fiske.  The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[33]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[34]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[35]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[36]  B. Delahaye,et al.  Influences On Knowledge processes In Organizational Learning: The Psychosocial Filter , 2000 .

[37]  Fred E. Fiedler,et al.  Leadership and effective management , 1974 .

[38]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[39]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Assessing the Relationship between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different can You Be? , 1994 .

[40]  Sandi W. Smith,et al.  Understanding the audiences of a health communication campaign: A discriminant analysis of potential organ donors based on intent to donate , 1996 .

[41]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  Multiple factor analysis combined with PLS path modelling. Application to the analysis of relationships between physicochemical variables, sensory profiles and hedonic judgements , 2001 .

[42]  Dustin York,et al.  Sharing the knowledge , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[43]  M. Kiggundu.  Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[44]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Peter J. van Baalen,et al.  The Implications of Different Models of Social Relations for Understanding Knowledge Sharing , 2004 .

[46]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[47]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[48]  Yasmin Merali.  Building and Developing Capabilities: A Cognitive Congruence Framework , 2003 .

[49]  Herman Wold,et al.  Soft modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions , 1982 .

[50]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[51]  J. J. Berends,et al.  The relational dimension of knowledge sharing: an empirical stud of an industrial research group , 2003 .

[52]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Economic Organization: The Case For Candor , 1996 .

[53]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[54]  Nick Haslam,et al.  Relational Models Theory : A Contemporary Overview , 2004 .

[55]  John K. Butler.  Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory , 1991 .

[56]  Tom Young,et al.  1 – Principles of knowledge management , 2011 .

[57]  I. Ajzen.  Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .

[58]  W. Lambert,et al.  Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. ALAN PAGE FISKE , 1993 .

[59]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[60]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[61]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  M. Brauer,et al.  Social power , 2006 .

[63]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[64]  S Elliott,et al.  Sharing knowledge and best practices: the hows and whys of tapping your organization's hidden reservoirs of knowledge. , 1999, Health Forum journal.

[65]  Mary Cavanaugh.  Power and Communication Behavior: A Formulative Investigation. , 1979 .

[66]  B. Cocroft,et al.  Book reviewStructures of social life: the four elementary forms of human relations: Alan Page Fiske New York: Macmillan Inc., 1991, 480 pp., $29.95 (cloth) , 1994 .

[67]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy , 1998 .

[68]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[69]  Tor Korneliussen,et al.  The effects of personal ties and reciprocity on the performance of small firms in horizontal strategic alliances , 1997 .

[70]  J. Liebowitz,et al.  Knowledge Organizations: What Every Manager Should Know , 1998 .

[71]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[72]  Anthony Forge,et al.  The Golden Fleece , 1972 .

[73]  Gee-Woo Bock,et al.  Determinants of the individual's knowledge sharing behavior : the theory of reasoned action perspective = 조직 내 개인의 지식공유행위에 관한 결정요인 연구 : 합리적 행위이론 관점 , 2001 .

[74]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[75]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[76]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[77]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[78]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[79]  R. Dahl.  The concept of power , 2007 .

[80]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  An Activity Theory Approach for Studying the Dynamics of Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[81]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems , 2002 .

[82]  Harrie van Tuijl,et al.  Task complexity and task, goal, and reward interdependence in group performance management: A prescriptive model , 2002 .

[83]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS Path modelling and multiple table analysis. Application to the cosmetic habits of women in Ile-de-France , 2001 .

[84]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Economics, Organization and Management , 1992 .

[85]  R. Marcella,et al.  Employee perceptions of knowledge sharing: Employment threat or synergy for the greater good? A case study , 2000 .

[86]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[87]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[88]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[89]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  An empirical analysis of a goal setting questionnaire , 1991 .

[90]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[91]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  The self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation / 135 , 1974 .

[92]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[93]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[94]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .