Engaging With Contemporary Dance: What Can Body Movements Tell us About Audience Responses?

In live performances seated audiences have restricted opportunities for response. Some responses are obvious, such as applause and cheering, but there are also many apparently incidental movements including posture shifts, fixing hair, scratching and adjusting glasses. Do these movements provide clues to people's level of engagement with a performance? Our basic hypothesis is that audience responses are part of a bi-directional system of audience-performer communication. This communication is part of what distinguishes live from recorded performance and underpins live performers' moment-to-moment sense of how well a performance is going. Here we investigate the range of visible real-time movements of audiences in four live contemporary dance performances. Video recordings of performers and audiences were analyzed using computer vision techniques for extracting face, hand and body movement data. The meaning of audience movements were analyzed by comparing clips of the audience at moments of maximum and minimum movement to expert and novice judges. The results show that audience clips with the lowest overall movement are judged as displaying the highest engagement. In addition, we found that while there is no systematic relationship between audience and dancers movement, hands seem to play an especially significant role since they move significantly more compared to the rest of the body. We draw on these findings to argue that collective stillness is an especially salient signal of audience engagement.

[1]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Joint action aesthetics , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  Fabrizio Smeraldi,et al.  Exploring Audience Behaviour During Contemporary Dance Performances , 2016, MOCO.

[3]  W. Dunsmuir,et al.  Dangers and uses of cross-correlation in analyzing time series in perception, performance, movement, and neuroscience: The importance of constructing transfer function autoregressive models , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.

[4]  M. Adachi,et al.  How Live Performance Moves the Human Heart , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  Kleomenis Katevas,et al.  Robot Comedy Lab: experimenting with the social dynamics of live performance , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[6]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The stream of experience when watching artistic movies. Dynamic aesthetic effects revealed by the Continuous Evaluation Procedure (CEP) , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Nachiappan Chockalingam,et al.  What does not happen: quantifying embodied engagement using NIMI and self-adaptors , 2014 .

[8]  Chen Wang,et al.  Sensing a live audience , 2014, CHI.

[9]  Martin Grunwald,et al.  EEG changes caused by spontaneous facial self-touch may represent emotion regulating processes and working memory maintenance , 2014, Brain Research.

[10]  D. Sumpter,et al.  The dynamics of audience applause , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al.  Automatically Recognizing Facial Expression: Predicting Engagement and Frustration , 2013, EDM.

[12]  Corinne Jola,et al.  The experience of watching dance: phenomenological–neuroscience duets , 2012 .

[13]  Patrick G. T. Healey,et al.  Performing places , 2011, C&C '11.

[14]  F. Pollick,et al.  Arousal Decrease in Sleeping Beauty: Audiences' Neurophysiological Correlates to Watching a Narrative Dance Performance of two-and-a-half hours , 2011 .

[15]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Interpreting Hand-Over-Face Gestures , 2011, ACII.

[16]  Mathias Broth,et al.  THE THEATRE PERFORMANCE AS INTERACTION BETWEEN ACTORS AND THEIR AUDIENCE , 2011 .

[17]  Celine Latulipe,et al.  Love, hate, arousal and engagement: exploring audience responses to performing arts , 2011, CHI.

[18]  Matthew Reason,et al.  Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance , 2010, Dance Research Journal.

[19]  Freya Bailes,et al.  Time Series Analysis as a Method to Examine Acoustical Influences on Real-time Perception of Music , 2010 .

[20]  M. Leman,et al.  Basic Gestures as Spatiotemporal Reference Frames for Repetitive Dance/Music Patterns in Samba and Charleston , 2010 .

[21]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  Cognition and the temporal arts: Investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Allison Winters,et al.  Emotion, Embodiment, and Mirror Neurons in Dance/Movement Therapy: A Connection Across Disciplines , 2008 .

[23]  Elaine Toms,et al.  What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  B. Schneider,et al.  The Meaning of Employee Engagement , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[25]  Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze,et al.  Does Body Movement Engage You More in Digital Game Play? and Why? , 2007, ACII.

[26]  Ashish Kapoor,et al.  Automatic prediction of frustration , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Toward an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[28]  Christian Küblbeck,et al.  Face detection and tracking in video sequences using the modifiedcensus transformation , 2006, Image Vis. Comput..

[29]  Victor Bissonnette,et al.  Effects of Modeling and Topic Stimulus on Self-Referent Touching , 2005, Perceptual and motor skills.

[30]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Influences of Large-Scale Form on Continuous Ratings in Response to a Contemporary Piece in a Live Concert Setting , 2004 .

[32]  Emery Schubert Modeling Perceived Emotion With Continuous Musical Features , 2004 .

[33]  Antonio Camurri,et al.  Recognizing emotion from dance movement: comparison of spectator recognition and automated techniques , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Gunnar Farnebäck,et al.  Two-Frame Motion Estimation Based on Polynomial Expansion , 2003, SCIA.

[35]  J. Bavelas,et al.  Listeners as co-narrators. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  L Heaven,et al.  External Motivators of Self-Touching Behavior , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[37]  Peter Chapman,et al.  Engagement in multimedia training systems , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[38]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life , 1997 .

[39]  William A. Kahn Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[40]  P L Rögels,et al.  The Function of Self-Touchings, Posture Shifts, and Motor Discharges in Children from 3 to 6 Years of Age , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[41]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Self-Touching and Impressions of Others , 1987 .

[42]  Felix Barroso,et al.  Self-touching and attentional processes: The role of task difficulty, selection stage, and sex differences , 1986 .

[43]  P Bull,et al.  The interpretation of posture through an alternative methodology to role play. , 1978, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[44]  W. Stone The International Exhibition—Music Loan Collection , 1885, Nature.

[45]  Patrick G. T. Healey,et al.  What can Hand Movements Tell us about Audience Engagement? , 2017, CogSci.

[46]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  Effects of observer experience on continuous measures of engagement with a contemporary dance work , 2009 .

[47]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  A quantitative approach to analysing reliability of engagement responses to dance , 2009 .

[48]  D. McNeill Gesture and Thought , 2005 .

[49]  R. Shackleton A Quantitative Approach , 2005 .

[50]  Song Shun-lin,et al.  Real-time Face Detection and Tracking in Video Sequences , 2004 .

[51]  R. Johansson,et al.  Hand Movements , 2001 .

[52]  D. Thornton,et al.  Lag-Length Selection and Tests of Granger Causality between Money and Income , 1984 .

[53]  C. Goodwin The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation , 1979 .

[54]  F. G. The Measure of Fidget , 1885, Nature.