Regional variations in diagnostic practices.

BACKGROUND Current methods of risk adjustment rely on diagnoses recorded in clinical and administrative records. Differences among providers in diagnostic practices could lead to bias. METHODS We used Medicare claims data from 1999 through 2006 to measure trends in diagnostic practices for Medicare beneficiaries. Regions were grouped into five quintiles according to the intensity of hospital and physician services that beneficiaries in the region received. We compared trends with respect to diagnoses, laboratory testing, imaging, and the assignment of Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) among beneficiaries who moved to regions with a higher or lower intensity of practice. RESULTS Beneficiaries within each quintile who moved during the study period to regions with a higher or lower intensity of practice had similar numbers of diagnoses and similar HCC risk scores (as derived from HCC coding algorithms) before their move. The number of diagnoses and the HCC measures increased as the cohort aged, but they increased to a greater extent among beneficiaries who moved to regions with a higher intensity of practice than among those who moved to regions with the same or lower intensity of practice. For example, among beneficiaries who lived initially in regions in the lowest quintile, there was a greater increase in the average number of diagnoses among those who moved to regions in a higher quintile than among those who moved to regions within the lowest quintile (increase of 100.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6 to 112.1; vs. increase of 61.7%; 95% CI, 55.8 to 67.4). Moving to each higher quintile of intensity was associated with an additional 5.9% increase (95% CI, 5.2 to 6.7) in HCC scores, and results were similar with respect to laboratory testing and imaging. CONCLUSIONS Substantial differences in diagnostic practices that are unlikely to be related to patient characteristics are observed across U.S. regions. The use of clinical or claims-based diagnoses in risk adjustment may introduce important biases in comparative-effectiveness studies, public reporting, and payment reforms.

[1]  Michael J Barry,et al.  Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  J. Lave,et al.  Is Survival Better at Hospitals With Higher “End-of-Life” Treatment Intensity? , 2010, Medical care.

[3]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  Lisa I. Iezzoni,et al.  Risk Adjustment of Medicare Capitation Payments Using the CMS-HCC Model , 2004, Health care financing review.

[5]  Elliott S Fisher,et al.  Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. Health care. , 2008, Health affairs.

[6]  Elliott S Fisher,et al.  Variations in the longitudinal efficiency of academic medical centers. , 2004, Health affairs.

[7]  F. Lederle,et al.  Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms with physical examination and ultrasound. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  D. Sarti,et al.  Thyroid Incidentalomas: Prevalence by Palpation and Ultrasonography , 1994 .

[9]  J. Skinner,et al.  Are Regional Variations in End-of-Life Care Intensity Explained by Patient Preferences?: A Study of the US Medicare Population , 2007, Medical care.

[10]  J. Skinner,et al.  Is technological change in medicine always worth it? The case of acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, Health affairs.

[11]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  Are increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer? , 2000, JAMA.

[12]  J. Skinner,et al.  Medicare upcoding and hospital ownership. , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[13]  W C Black,et al.  Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Kathryn E. McGoldrick,et al.  Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States , 2004 .

[16]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Qiong Zhou,et al.  Looking Forward, Looking Back: Assessing Variations in Hospital Resource Use and Outcomes for Elderly Patients With Heart Failure , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[18]  S J Schnitt,et al.  Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of Ductal Proliferative Breast Lesions Using Standardized Criteria , 1992, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  F Nemeth,et al.  End of life. , 2007, Bratislavske lekarske listy.

[21]  J G Hennessey,et al.  Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: comparison of 4- and 8-mm interscan spacing. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  John E. Wennberg,et al.  Tracking the Care of Patients with Severe Chronic Illness: The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 2008 , 2008 .

[23]  E. Fisher.  Paying for performance--risks and recommendations. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. Stafford,et al.  Variation in routine electrocardiogram use in academic primary care practice. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  G. Coffman,et al.  Chronic conditions and risk of in-hospital death. , 1994, Health services research.