The effect of temperature and group perception feedbacks on thermal comfort

Abstract This paper aims to identify the contribution of temperature feedback and group perception feedback on the improvement of thermal comfort. A controlled thermal comfort experiment with a total of 158 subjects was conducted to figure out the impact. The results indicate that both have positive effects on occupants’ thermal comfort. Group perception feedback can improve thermal sensation by 0.23 under cooler winter conditions, while temperature feedback can improve occupants’ thermal sensation by 0.47 under warmer conditions. Thermal satisfaction increased 0.24 with temperature feedback, indicating that temperature feedback could eliminate the downward trend of satisfaction. Extreme votes in thermal sensation, defined as votes at which the deviation from the mean exceeds the standard deviation, had decreased by 69% (from 36/77 to 11/77) with group perception feedback. Expectation theory, representing occupants’ expectations of thermal environment, can effectively explain why thermal comfort was improved by feedback. The possible reason is that subjects were aware that extreme feedbacks cannot change the current environment since either air temperature or percentage of satisfied subjects meet the standard, so the subjects’ thermal expectations are lowered correspondingly. For practice, it is possible to appropriately turn down the heating set point under overheating conditions to improve energy efficiency, based on the temperature feedback. Furthermore, group perception feedback can improve the thermal comfort under conditions that are at the edge of meeting the comfort criteria in winter and minimize extreme votes as well to build a more comfortable environment.

[1]  Thomas Parkinson,et al.  Thermal pleasure in built environments: physiology of alliesthesia , 2015 .

[2]  Borong Lin,et al.  Indoor environmental quality of green office buildings in China: Large-scale and long-term measurement , 2019, Building and Environment.

[3]  Changxu Wu,et al.  The effect of interactive feedback on attitude and behavior change in setting air conditioners in the workplace , 2019 .

[4]  Xiaodong Pan,et al.  Light and Dark Adaption Times Based on Pupil Area Variation at Entrance and Exit Areas of Highway Tunnels , 2014 .

[5]  Geun Young Yun,et al.  Influences of perceived control on thermal comfort and energy use in buildings , 2018 .

[6]  Yingxin Zhu,et al.  Evaluating thermal comfort in mixed-mode buildings: A field study in a subtropical climate , 2015 .

[7]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Partial- and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort— Part I: Uniform environmental conditions , 2006 .

[8]  Borong Lin,et al.  Comparative study on the indoor environment quality of green office buildings in China with a long-term field measurement and investigation , 2015 .

[9]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Saving energy when using air conditioners in offices—Behavioral pattern and design indications , 2014 .

[10]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: a new analysis , 2016 .

[11]  Carol C. Menassa,et al.  Personalized human comfort in indoor building environments under diverse conditioning modes , 2017 .

[12]  Jørn Toftum,et al.  Thermal adaptation in occupant-driven HVAC control , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[13]  Y Zhu,et al.  Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. , 2013, Indoor air.

[14]  Toby Mündel,et al.  Human thermoregulatory behavior during rest and exercise — A prospective review , 2010, Physiology & Behavior.

[15]  Brent Stephens,et al.  Open Source Building Science Sensors (OSBSS): A low-cost Arduino-based platform for long-term indoor environmental data collection , 2016 .

[16]  Qingqing Feng,et al.  Experimental comparison between set-point based and satisfaction based indoor thermal environment control , 2016 .

[17]  Baizhan Li,et al.  A modified method of evaluating the impact of air humidity on human acceptable air temperatures in hot-humid environments , 2018 .

[18]  K. Steemers,et al.  Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces , 2003 .

[19]  John D Spengler,et al.  The Impact of Working in a Green Certified Building on Cognitive Function and Health. , 2017, Building and environment.

[20]  Mglc Marcel Loomans,et al.  Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices , 2013 .

[21]  Borong Lin,et al.  The underlying linkage between personal control and thermal comfort: Psychological or physical effects? , 2016 .

[22]  D. Loveday,et al.  Feedback messaging, thermal comfort and usage of office-based personal comfort systems , 2019 .

[23]  Alex Parkinson,et al.  Continuous IEQ monitoring system: Performance specifications and thermal comfort classification , 2019, Building and Environment.

[24]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Experimenter effects in behavioral research , 1968 .

[25]  Mark Standeven,et al.  Thermal comfort for free-running buildings , 1996 .

[26]  Maohui Luo,et al.  Revisiting individual and group differences in thermal comfort based on ASHRAE database , 2020, Energy and Buildings.

[27]  P. Fanger,et al.  Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates , 2002 .

[28]  Alex Parkinson,et al.  Continuous IEQ monitoring system: Context and development , 2019, Building and Environment.

[29]  Y Zhu,et al.  Experimental study of the influence of anticipated control on human thermal sensation and thermal comfort. , 2014, Indoor air.

[30]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia , 2011 .