Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis

Aims: To present background, principles, and procedures for a strategy for qualitative analysis called systematic text condensation and discuss this approach compared with related strategies. Methods: Giorgi’s psychological phenomenological analysis is the point of departure and inspiration for systematic text condensation. The basic elements of Giorgi’s method and the elaboration of these in systematic text condensation are presented, followed by a detailed description of procedures for analysis according to systematic text condensation. Finally, similarities and differences compared with other frequently applied methods for qualitative analysis are identified, as the foundation of a discussion of strengths and limitations of systematic text condensation. Results: Systematic text condensation is a descriptive and explorative method for thematic cross-case analysis of different types of qualitative data, such as interview studies, observational studies, and analysis of written texts. The method represents a pragmatic approach, although inspired by phenomenological ideas, and various theoretical frameworks can be applied. The procedure consists of the following steps: 1) total impression – from chaos to themes; 2) identifying and sorting meaning units – from themes to codes; 3) condensation – from code to meaning; 4) synthesizing – from condensation to descriptions and concepts. Similarities and differences comparing systematic text condensation with other frequently applied qualitative methods regarding thematic analysis, theoretical methodological framework, analysis procedures, and taxonomy are discussed. Conclusions: Systematic text condensation is a strategy for analysis developed from traditions shared by most of the methods for analysis of qualitative data. The method offers the novice researcher a process of intersubjectivity, reflexivity, and feasibility, while maintaining a responsible level of methodological rigour.

[1]  Janice M Morse,et al.  Molding Qualitative Health Research , 2011, Qualitative health research.

[2]  K. Malterud,et al.  Finding the right balance of physical activity: a focus group study about experiences among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  C. Glenton,et al.  What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[4]  J. Ponterotto.  Qualitative research in multicultural psychology: philosophical underpinnings, popular approaches, and ethical considerations. , 2010, Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology.

[5]  Takeo Nakayama,et al.  Characteristics of qualitative studies in influential journals of general medicine: a critical review. , 2009, Bioscience trends.

[6]  Brynjulf Stige,et al.  Toward an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research , 2009, Qualitative health research.

[7]  A. Giorgi,et al.  A Qualitative Effort to Describe Experience Scientifically Review ofThe descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach , 2009, History & Philosophy of Psychology.

[8]  C. Riessman.  Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences , 2007 .

[9]  K. Malterud,et al.  “So you think I’ll survive?”: a qualitative study about doctor-patient dialogues preceding high-risk cardiac surgery or intervention , 2007, Heart.

[10]  K. Malterud,et al.  Perceived Vulnerability to Heart Disease in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Qualitative Interview Study , 2006, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  J. Brocki,et al.  A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology , 2006 .

[12]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[13]  R. Barbour.  The Newfound Credibility of Qualitative Research? Tales of Technical Essentialism and Co-Option , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[14]  K. Malterud.  Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning — en innføring, 2.utg , 2003 .

[15]  J. Le Fanu.  The case of the missing data , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[17]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[18]  K Chamberlain,et al.  Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research , 2000, Journal of health psychology.

[19]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis , 1999 .

[20]  William L. Miller,et al.  Clinical Research: A Multimethod Typology and Qualitative Roadmap , 1999 .

[21]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[22]  M. Sandelowski.  One is the liveliest number: the case orientation of qualitative research. , 1996, Research in nursing & health.

[23]  K. Malterud.  Shared understanding of the qualitative research process. Guidelines for the medical researcher. , 1993, Family practice.

[24]  Anton J. Kuzel,et al.  Sampling in qualitative inquiry. , 1992 .

[25]  A. Giorgi,et al.  Phenomenology and Psychological Research , 1991 .

[26]  D. Haraway.  Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[27]  Donna Harawy.  Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[28]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[29]  Amedeo Giorgi.  Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method , 1985 .

[30]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[31]  E. Kohák.  Idea and Experience: Edmund Husserl's Project of Phenomenology in Ideas I , 1980 .

[32]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[33]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[34]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .