The effect of B1 field inhomogeneity and the nonselective inversion profile on the kinetics of FAIR‐based perfusion MRI

Perfusion imaging with pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques, like flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR), may suffer from inflow of fresh, i.e., unlabeled, spins. Inflow of fresh spins is caused by the arrival of unlabeled spins in the image slice and can lead to underestimation of the perfusion if not taken into account. In this study it was shown that a decrease in B1 field strength toward the edge of the transmit coil and the consequent reduction in the inversion efficiency leads to a narrowing of the arterial delivery function and a reduction in FAIR signal. Increasing the B1 amplitude of the adiabatic inversion pulse from 2.3 to 5.7 times its minimum amplitude requirement resulted in an observed increase of 40 to 80% in the rat brain FAIR signal at inflow times longer than 0.65 s. For coils with limited dimensions and significant B1 inhomogeneity over the perfusion labeling slab, the application of an excessively large B1 amplitude in combination with adiabatic inversion is recommended to optimize the FAIR perfusion contrast. Magn Reson Med 53:1355–1362, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Transit time, trailing time, and cerebral blood flow during brain activation: Measurement using multislice, pulsed spin‐labeling perfusion imaging , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  J. H. Duyn,et al.  Multislice Imaging of Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion with Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling , 1998, NeuroImage.

[3]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  Effect of vascular crushing on FAIR perfusion kinetics, using a BIR‐4 pulse in a magnetization prepared FLASH sequence , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Transfer insensitive labeling technique (TILT): Application to multislice functional perfusion imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Seong-Gi Kim.  Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: Application to functional mapping , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Effect of transit times on quantification of cerebral blood flow by the FAIR T1‐difference approach , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  M. S. Silver,et al.  Highly selective {π}/{2} and π pulse generation , 1984 .

[8]  R. Buxton,et al.  Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II) , 1998 .

[9]  S Warach,et al.  A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J Hrabe,et al.  RF excitation profiles with FAIR: Impact of truncation of the arterial input function on quantitative perfusion , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  R. Buxton,et al.  Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[12]  R R Edelman,et al.  Signal targeting with alternating radiofrequency (STAR) sequences: Application to MR angiography , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  V. Mai,et al.  Extraslice spin tagging (EST) magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of perfusion , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  S. Williams,et al.  A Model for Quantification of Perfusion in Pulsed Labelling Techniques , 1996, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  P. Bandettini,et al.  QUIPSS II with thin‐slice TI1 periodic saturation: A method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J L Tanabe,et al.  MR perfusion imaging in human brain using the UNFAIR technique , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  E. Rostrup,et al.  Improved perfusion quantification in FAIR imaging by offset correction , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  J. Duyn,et al.  Pulsed arterial spin labeling: comparison of multisection baseline and functional MR imaging perfusion signal at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial results in six subjects. , 2002, Radiology.

[20]  R. Goebel,et al.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Measurement of rat brain perfusion by NMR using spin labeling of arterial water: In vivo determination of the degree of spin labeling , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.