Cellular and molecular interactions between MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion.

Ultra-fine surface features are commonly used to modulate cellular activity on a variety of materials. The continuing challenge for materials in contact with bone is the development of a material with both favorable surface and bulk properties to modulate not only the cell-substrate interactions, but also to ensure the long-term stability of the implant. In a combined approach involving material sciences and cell and molecular biology, the nature and mechanism of cell-substrate interaction, in particular, the molecular machinery controlling cell response to the surface of the nanostructured titanium based material produced by the high pressure torsion (HPT) process is assessed. The degree of pre-osteoblast attachment and rate of growth, which are regulated through the activity and interaction of proteins present in the extracellular matrix and associated with cytoskeleton and focal adhesion, are notably increased on the HPT-processed titanium substrates. The improved cell activity is attributed to the nanostructured feature of these substrates consisting of ultra-fine crystals (<50 nm) and a distinct surface oxide layer which provide higher degree of surface wettability. These findings demonstrate the advantages of HPT-processed titanium over the conventional and coated titanium implants, as both mechanical properties and cellular response are improved.

[1]  B. Mattiasson,et al.  Variations of wettability and protein adsorption on solid siliceous carriers grafted with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[2]  B. Scheffel,et al.  Structure and properties of titanium oxide layers deposited by reactive plasma activated electron beam evaporation , 2005 .

[3]  I. Naert,et al.  Failure of oral implants: aetiology, symptoms and influencing factors , 1998, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[4]  T. Langdon,et al.  Orientation imaging microscopy of ultrafine-grained nickel , 2002 .

[5]  J. Bye,et al.  Density and cell cycle dependence of cell surface proteins in hamster fibroblasts. , 1974, Cell.

[6]  R. Segal,et al.  Studies on intercellular LETS glycoprotein matrices , 1978, Cell.

[7]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[8]  R. Valiev,et al.  Nanostructuring of metals by severe plastic deformation for advanced properties , 2004, Nature materials.

[9]  C. R. Howlett,et al.  Attachment of human bone cells to tissue culture polystyrene and to unmodified polystyrene: the effect of surface chemistry upon initial cell attachment. , 1993, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[10]  K. Kurzydłowski,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline titanium and Ti–Ta–Nb alloy manufactured using various deformation methods , 2005 .

[11]  U. Meyer,et al.  Attachment Kinetics and Differentiations of Osteoblasts on Different Biomaterials , 1993 .

[12]  Percy Williams Bridgman,et al.  Effects of High Shearing Stress Combined with High Hydrostatic Pressure , 1935 .

[13]  E. Korn Biochemistry of actomyosin-dependent cell motility (a review). , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. Daculsi,et al.  Role of fibronectin during biological apatite crystal nucleation: ultrastructural characterization. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  Hugues Berry,et al.  Adsorption-induced fibronectin aggregation and fibrillogenesis. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[16]  Maryam Tabrizian,et al.  The significance of crystallographic texture of titanium alloy substrates on pre-osteoblast responses. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[17]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Immunoelectron microscopic studies of the sites of cell-substratum and cell-cell contacts in cultured fibroblasts , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  H. Busscher,et al.  The influence of substratum surface free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  F Rupp,et al.  High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[20]  Maria Dolors Baró,et al.  Experimental parameters influencing grain refinement and microstructural evolution during high-pressure torsion , 2003 .

[21]  M. Tabrizian,et al.  Nanostructuring of a Titanium Material by High‐Pressure Torsion Improves Pre‐Osteoblast Attachment , 2007 .

[22]  T. Webster,et al.  Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  H. Rack,et al.  Titanium alloys in total joint replacement--a materials science perspective. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[24]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[25]  D. Prockop,et al.  Dkk-1-derived Synthetic Peptides and Lithium Chloride for the Control and Recovery of Adult Stem Cells from Bone Marrow* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  C. Damsky,et al.  Fibronectin is a survival factor for differentiated osteoblasts. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[27]  D. Boettiger,et al.  Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate-dependent changes in fibronectin conformation. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  R. Valiev,et al.  Materials science: Nanomaterial advantage , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Rena Bizios,et al.  Evaluation of cytocompatibility and bending modulus of nanoceramic/polymer composites. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[30]  Shin Lin,et al.  High-affinity interaction of vinculin with actin filaments in vitro , 1982, Cell.

[31]  R. Valiev,et al.  Bulk nanostructured materials from severe plastic deformation , 2000 .

[32]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[33]  P. Somasundaran,et al.  Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-aluminum-vanadium implant materials: effects on surface properties, glycoprotein adsorption, and MG63 cell attachment. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[34]  J. Spudich,et al.  Nonmuscle contractile proteins: the role of actin and myosin in cell motility and shape determination. , 1977, Annual review of biochemistry.

[35]  I. Singer,et al.  A transmembrane relationship between fibronectin and vinculin (130 kd protein): Serum modulation in normal and transformed hamster fibroblasts , 1981, Cell.

[36]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Studies on the biocompatibility of materials: fibroblast reorganization of substratum-bound fibronectin on surfaces varying in wettability. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[37]  A. Sergueeva,et al.  Advanced Mechanical Properties of Pure Titanium with Ultrafine Grained Structure , 2001 .

[38]  T. Webster,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[39]  K. Anselme,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. , 2000, Biomaterials.