A third arm — Design of a bypass prosthesis enabling incorporation

A variety of factors affect the performance of a person using a myoelectric prosthesis, including increased control noise, reduced sensory feedback, and muscle fatigue. Many studies use able-bodied subjects to control a myoelectric prosthesis using a bypass socket in order to make comparisons to movements made with intact limbs. Depending on the goals of the study, this approach can also allow for greater subject numbers and more statistical power in the analysis of the results. As we develop assessment tools and techniques to evaluate how peripheral nerve interfaces impact prosthesis incorporation, involving normally limbed subjects in the studies becomes challenging. We have designed a novel bypass prosthesis to allow for the assessment of prosthesis incorporation in able-bodied subjects. Incorporation of a prosthetic hand worn by a normally limbed subject requires that the prosthesis is a convincing, functional extension of their own body. We present the design and development of the bypass prosthesis with special attention to mounting position and angle of the prosthetic hand, the quality of the control system and the responsiveness of the feedback. The bypass prosthesis has been fitted with a myoelectrically-controlled hand that has been instrumented to measure the forces applied to the thumb, index, and middle fingers. The prosthetic hand was mounted on the bypass socket such that it is the same length as the subject's intact limb but at a medial rotation angle of 20° to prevent visual occlusion of the prosthetic hand. Force feedback is provided in the form of electrical stimulation, vibration, or force applied to the intact limb with milliseconds of delay. Preliminary data results from a cross-modal congruency task are included showing evidence of prosthesis incorporation in able-bodied subjects. This bypass will allow able-bodied subjects to participate in research studies that require the use of a prosthetic limb while also allowing the subjects to sense that the prosthesis is an extension of the body.

[1]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.

[2]  B Hudgins,et al.  Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[3]  G A Clark,et al.  Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  On the Shared Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand: Analysis of User–Prosthesis Interaction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  Richard F. ff. Weir,et al.  CHAPTER 32 DESIGN OF ARTIFICIAL ARMS AND HANDS FOR PROSTHETIC APPLICATIONS , 2005 .

[6]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  CLINICALLY PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF PATTERN RECOGNITION FOR MYOELECTRIC PROSTHESES , 2008 .

[7]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Motion Normalized Proportional Control for Improved Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Control of a Robotic Hand Using a Tongue Control System—A Prosthesis Application , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Dario Farina,et al.  Humans Can Integrate Augmented Reality Feedback in Their Sensorimotor Control of a Robotic Hand , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[12]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[13]  A. Kargov,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands , 2006 .

[14]  Benjamin Jones The design and test of an anthropomorphic hand prosthesis with multigrasp capability , 2015 .

[15]  Peter J Kyberd The influence of control format and hand design in single axis myoelectric hands: assessment of functionality of prosthetic hands using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[16]  G. Magenes,et al.  Two-channel real-time EMG control of a dexterous hand prosthesis , 2011, 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[17]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches☆ , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.