Power and Influence in and Around the Boardroom

This paper presents the early findings of a pilot study of the power and influence of part-time board members in the top 200 U.K. industrial and commercial firms by turnover and the top 50 U.K. financial institutions. The part-time board members hold multiple roles of either chairman and/or non-executive director of these organizations. The findings are presented around a tripartite model of power and influence. The results indicate that the power and influence of part-time board members is shaped by the simultaneous and interactive effects of a set of structural and contextual factors, position and skill in mobilizing a constellation of power sources, and skill and will in converting potential power into actual influence.

[1]  R. Tricker.  The independent director : a study of the non-executive director and of the audit committee , 1978 .

[2]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  POTENTIAL POWER AND POWER USE: AN INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR , 1993 .

[4]  Myles L. Mace,et al.  Directors: Myth and Reality , 1971 .

[5]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. , 1992 .

[6]  E. Herman.  Corporate Control, Corporate Power , 1982 .

[7]  G. Davis.  Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[8]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Ceo selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis , 1990 .

[9]  Rosemary Stewart,et al.  Chairmen and Chief Executives: an Exploration of Their Relationship , 1991 .

[10]  D. Knoke,et al.  Political Networks: The Structural Perspective , 1992 .

[11]  M. Conyon.  Corporate Governance Changes in UK Companies Between 1988 and 1993 , 1994 .

[12]  T. Lupton,et al.  The Social Background and Connections of “Top Decision Makers” , 1959 .

[13]  J. Fidler.  The British business elite: Its attitudes to class, status, and power , 1981 .

[14]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[15]  A. Pettigrew.  Information Control as a Power Resource , 1972 .

[16]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The New Public Management in Action , 1996 .

[17]  D. Norburn,et al.  The chief executive: A breed apart , 1989 .

[18]  Rita D. Kosnik.  Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance , 1987 .

[19]  D. Knoke.  Political Networks: Political Networks , 1990 .

[20]  M. Jelinek.  Managing change for competitive success , 1993 .

[21]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[22]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation Between Management and Boards of Directors in Large American Corporations , 1983 .

[23]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[24]  Clive Holtham,et al.  The Politics of Organisational Decision Making , 1975 .

[25]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  The leadership role of the new health authorities: An agenda for research and development , 1991 .

[26]  David Mechanic,et al.  Sources of Power of Lower Participants in Complex Organizations , 1962 .

[27]  D. Leighton,et al.  Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries , 1996 .

[28]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  On studying managerial elites , 1992 .

[29]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[30]  D. Knoke.  Political Networks: Contents , 1990 .