PROTOCOL: Guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development: A systematic review

[1]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation , 2020, Systematic Reviews.

[2]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance , 2019, Implementation Science.

[3]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Engaging Patients and Other Non-Researchers in Health Research: Defining Research Engagement , 2019, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Sophie Hill,et al.  Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews , 2019, Journal of health services research & policy.

[5]  Susan L Norris,et al.  The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective , 2019, BMJ Global Health.

[6]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research , 2018, Journal of general internal medicine.

[7]  R. Briner,et al.  Effective and efficient committee work: A Systematic overview of multidisciplinary literatures , 2018 .

[8]  A. Pollock,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review , 2018, Systematic Reviews.

[9]  S. Oliver,et al.  How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research , 2018, F1000Research.

[10]  M. Armstrong,et al.  Patient involvement in guidelines is poor five years after institute of medicine standards: review of guideline methodologies , 2017, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[11]  D G Altman,et al.  GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[12]  H. Schünemann,et al.  Incorporating patients' views in guideline development: a systematic review of guidance documents. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  Christopher Carroll,et al.  Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[14]  C. Mullins,et al.  Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuous patient engagement , 2016, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[15]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[16]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[17]  F. Schaafsma,et al.  Effectiveness of multifaceted implementation strategies for the implementation of back and neck pain guidelines in health care: a systematic review , 2015, Implementation Science.

[18]  T. Zuiderent-Jerak,et al.  An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development: exploring the potential for articulating patient knowledge in evidence‐based epistemic settings , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[19]  Emily Moore,et al.  Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. , 2015, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[20]  F. Sanfilippo,et al.  Breaking down silos: engaging students to help fix the US health care system , 2015, Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare.

[21]  J. Petkovic,et al.  How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis , 2014, BMJ Open.

[22]  Kathryn Oliver,et al.  New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[23]  Romina Brignardello-Petersen,et al.  Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[24]  Tim Evans,et al.  Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  Steve Gillard,et al.  Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge , 2012, Qualitative health research.

[26]  Paul Meissner,et al.  A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  Günter Ollenschläger,et al.  Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[29]  David Boud,et al.  Co‐Production and Health System Reform – From Re‐Imagining To Re‐Making , 2009 .

[30]  Elizabeth J. Paulsen,et al.  Evidence-informed health policy 2 – Survey of organizations that support the use of research evidence , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[31]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[32]  Ken Stein,et al.  A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[33]  A. Oxman,et al.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence , 2006, Health research policy and systems.

[34]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines , 2006, Health research policy and systems.