Statistical Analysis of Tract-Tracing Experiments Demonstrates a Dense, Complex Cortical Network in the Mouse

Anatomical tract tracing methods are the gold standard for estimating the weight of axonal connectivity between a pair of pre-defined brain regions. Large studies, comprising hundreds of experiments, have become feasible by automated methods. However, this comes at the cost of positive-mean noise making it difficult to detect weak connections, which are of particular interest as recent high resolution tract-tracing studies of the macaque have identified many more weak connections, adding up to greater connection density of cortical networks, than previously recognized. We propose a statistical framework that estimates connectivity weights and credibility intervals from multiple tract-tracing experiments. We model the observed signal as a log-normal distribution generated by a combination of tracer fluorescence and positive-mean noise, also accounting for injections into multiple regions. Using anterograde viral tract-tracing data provided by the Allen Institute for Brain Sciences, we estimate the connection density of the mouse intra-hemispheric cortical network to be 73% (95% credibility interval (CI): 71%, 75%); higher than previous estimates (40%). Inter-hemispheric density was estimated to be 59% (95% CI: 54%, 62%). The weakest estimable connections (about 6 orders of magnitude weaker than the strongest connections) are likely to represent only one or a few axons. These extremely weak connections are topologically more random and longer distance than the strongest connections, which are topologically more clustered and shorter distance (spatially clustered). Weak links do not substantially contribute to the global topology of a weighted brain graph, but incrementally increased topological integration of a binary graph. The topology of weak anatomical connections in the mouse brain, rigorously estimable down to the biological limit of a single axon between cortical areas in these data, suggests that they might confer functional advantages for integrative information processing and/or they might represent a stochastic factor in the development of the mouse connectome.

[1]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network Analysis of Corticocortical Connections Reveals Ventral and Dorsal Processing Streams in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Nikola T. Markov,et al.  A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  M. Breakspear,et al.  The connectomics of brain disorders , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Wiring cost and topological participation of the mouse brain connectome , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Alexandros Goulas,et al.  The strength of weak connections in the macaque cortico-cortical network , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[8]  M. Young,et al.  Advanced database methodology for the Collation of Connectivity data on the Macaque brain (CoCoMac). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks , 2003 .

[10]  Charles Watson,et al.  Distribution of neurons in functional areas of the mouse cerebral cortex reveals quantitatively different cortical zones , 2013, Front. Neuroanat..

[11]  Henry Kennedy,et al.  Cortical High-Density Counterstream Architectures , 2013, Science.

[12]  C. Stam Modern network science of neurological disorders , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  O. Sporns,et al.  Architecture of the cerebral cortical association connectome underlying cognition , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  D. B. Leitch,et al.  Neuron densities vary across and within cortical areas in primates , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Neural Networks of the Mouse Neocortex , 2014, Cell.

[16]  H. F. Song,et al.  Spatial embedding of structural similarity in the cerebral cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  B Jouve,et al.  A mathematical approach to the connectivity between the cortical visual areas of the macaque monkey. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Nikola T. Markov,et al.  Weight Consistency Specifies Regularities of Macaque Cortical Networks , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  M P Young,et al.  Anatomical connectivity defines the organization of clusters of cortical areas in the macaque monkey and the cat. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Zoltán Toroczkai,et al.  Why data coherence and quality is critical for understanding interareal cortical networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[24]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain , 2014, Nature.

[25]  Hongkui Zeng,et al.  Neuroinformatics of the Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas. , 2015, Methods.

[26]  Ruben Schmidt,et al.  Linking Macroscale Graph Analytical Organization to Microscale Neuroarchitectonics in the Macaque Connectome , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Kaas,et al.  Cellular scaling rules for primate brains , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Markus Diesmann,et al.  CoCoMac 2.0 and the future of tract-tracing databases , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[30]  Zoltán Toroczkai,et al.  The role of long-range connections on the specificity of the macaque interareal cortical network , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  J L Ringo,et al.  Neuronal interconnection as a function of brain size. , 1991, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[32]  Henry Kennedy,et al.  A Predictive Network Model of Cerebral Cortical Connectivity Based on a Distance Rule , 2013, Neuron.

[33]  Jack W Scannell,et al.  The connectional organization of neural systems in the cat cerebral cortex , 1993, Current Biology.