Signal-averaged P-wave ECG discriminates between persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (Afib) has been associated with abnormal signal-averaged P wave (SAPW) parameters but whether SAPW is associated with the time course of these arrhythmias (persistent vs. paroxysmal, frequent vs. rare episodes) remains unknown. This article assesses the significance of SAPW duration in distinguishing patients with paroxysmal from those with persistent Afib. SAPW electrocardiogram was performed with a "double triggering" software system for acquisition and analysis of data. SAPW total duration (TD), X, Y, and Z leads magnitudes and vector signal magnitudes were measured offline. Optimal cutoff value between control and patient groups was determined by using a receiver operator characteristic curve. Data were analyzed to compare controls with patients groups and between patient groups according to time course of the arrhythmic history. Fifteen age-matched patients without a history of Afib and 55 patients with a history of Afib (33 with paroxysmal and 22 with persistent arrhythmia) were studied off antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients with history of persistent arrhythmia were studied within 2 days after electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. SAPW TD was the only parameter consistently associated with Afib. SAPW TD was 98 +/- 6 ms (mean +/- SD) in the control group, 127 +/- 19 ms in the pooled patients group (P =.0001); 122 +/- 20 ms for paroxysmal and 133 +/- 17 ms for the persistent Afib group (P =.04). Analysis of other SAPW parameters were not statistically significant. SAPW duration is a simple method to identify patients with history of Afib. A significantly longer SAPW TD characterizes patients with a history of persistent as opposed to paroxysmal Afib. Prolongation of SAPW TD possibly reflects more advanced electrophysiological changes, creating a more stable substrate that leads to persistence of the arrhythmia.

[1]  M Fukunami,et al.  Prediction of transition to chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by signal-averaged electrocardiography: a prospective study. , 1997, Circulation.

[2]  A. Capucci,et al.  P-wave dispersion index: a marker of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. , 1997, International journal of cardiology.

[3]  S. Marx,et al.  Uncommon Atrial Flutter: Characteristics, Mechanisms, and Results of Ablative Therapy , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  M Fukunami,et al.  Characteristics of frequency content of atrial signal-averaged electrocardiograms during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  P. Stafford,et al.  Quantitative analysis of signal-averaged P waves in idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Lung Atrial fibrillation: Current understandings and research imperatives , 1993 .

[7]  J. A. Gomes,et al.  P Wave Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiography Techniques , 1998 .

[8]  J Fujii,et al.  Clinical features of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. An observation of 94 patients. , 1981, Japanese heart journal.

[9]  J. Windle,et al.  Signal-averaged electrocardiograms in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. , 1988, American heart journal.

[10]  M. Allessie,et al.  Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. , 1995, Circulation.

[11]  N. Kouchoukos,et al.  Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation in Man: Studies Following Open Heart Surgery * , 1978, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  A. Michelucci,et al.  Influence of Age, Lead Axis, Frequency of Arrhythmic Episodes, and Atrial Dimensions on P Wave Triggered SAECG in Patients with Lone Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  P. Stafford,et al.  Optimal analysis of the signal averaged P wave in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. , 1995, British heart journal.

[14]  S J Evans,et al.  Use of P-wave-triggered, P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram to predict atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1995, American heart journal.

[15]  M. Russo,et al.  Histological substrate of atrial biopsies in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. , 1997, Circulation.

[16]  P. Stafford,et al.  Frequency Analysis of the P Wave: Comparative Techniques , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  M Fukunami,et al.  Detection of Patients at Risk for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation During Sinus Rhythm by P Wave‐Triggered Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiogram , 1991, Circulation.

[18]  J. Steinberg,et al.  The signal-averaged P wave duration: a rapid and noninvasive marker of risk of atrial fibrillation. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  M R Franz,et al.  Electrical remodeling of the human atrium: similar effects in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  S. Zelenkofske,et al.  Value of the P‐Wave Signal‐Averaged ECG for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery , 1993, Circulation.

[21]  T. Inoue,et al.  The signal-averaged electrocardiogram of P wave in patients with documented atrial fibrillation or flutter and in patients with left or right atrial overload without atrial fibrillation. , 1993, Japanese heart journal.