Using collaborative activity as a means to explore student performance and understanding

This paper presents data from the beginning process of restructuring a usability-engineering course to incorporate aspects of collaborative-process theory with required course content. Students' collaborative processes were evaluated at the end of the semester in order to identify key areas that instructors would need to support better in future iterations of the course. Overall students were skilled communicators, but lacked ability in areas of planning, productivity and critical evaluation. A closer examination was made of difficulties that students had with critical evaluation and trade-off analysis processes since these were key aspects of the course. Findings from analyses were used to suggest ways that the course could be modified in the future to better prepare students to address these important concepts in usability engineering.

[1]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[2]  G. Salomon,et al.  When teams do not function the way they ought to , 1989 .

[3]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION II. TEACHING METHODS THAT WORK , 2000 .

[4]  Marcela Borge Regulating social interactions: Developing a functional theory of collaboration , 2007 .

[5]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Facilitating Students’ Inquiry Learning and Metacognitive Development Through Modifiable Software Advisers , 2000 .

[6]  S. Stein What's All the Fuss About? , 1996 .

[7]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[8]  A. Schoenfeld Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[9]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse , 1999 .

[10]  P. K. Imbrie,et al.  The future of engineering education , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[11]  Brenda White,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , 2006 .

[12]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Group Work in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics: Consequences of Ignoring Gender and Race , 1998 .

[13]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[14]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Articulating case-based learning outcomes and assessment , 2007 .

[15]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension Strategies: A Natural History of One Program for Enhancing Learning. Technical Report No. 334. , 1985 .

[16]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The long road from a shared screen to a shared understanding , 2000 .

[17]  Pm Jenkinson,et al.  Cognitive , 2020, Definitions.