Influence of earthquake duration on the response of steel moment frames

Abstract The influence of ground motion duration on the seismic response of steel moment frames is examined is this paper, with due consideration for cyclic degradation effects. A set of 77 spectrally equivalent pairs of short and long records is utilised in detailed nonlinear dynamic assessments in order to isolate the effects of ground motion duration. The influence of duration is firstly evaluated considering degrading and non-degrading idealised bilinear SDOF systems, for various levels of lateral strength representing practical ranges encountered in design. Subsequently, a sensitivity assessment focusing on the main parameters affecting the response of hysteretic degrading models is carried out through comparative incremental dynamic analysis. Whilst the effect of duration becomes more pronounced with the increase in lateral strength demands, particularly when approaching collapse, the cyclic degradation rate is shown to play a significant role even at lower levels typically associated with design. The performance of EC8-compliant frames indicates a higher probability of collapse when long-duration ground motion records are used, with a typical reduction of about 20% in the collapse capacity, in comparison with short-duration cases. The influence of duration is also examined through collapse capacity spectra, based on the seismic performance of 50 steel moment frames, which show that considerable reduction in the structural collapse capacity of structural systems occurs when relatively long duration records are adopted, for a wide range of dynamic characteristics. This becomes particularly evident in the case of buildings with relatively significant cyclic deterioration rates, where collapse capacity reductions up to 40% due to the influence of earthquake duration are obtained.

[1]  Frank McKenna,et al.  OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[2]  J. Bommer,et al.  THE EFFECTIVE DURATION OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTION , 1999 .

[3]  A. Y. Elghazouli,et al.  Influence of deterioration modelling on the seismic response of steel moment frames designed to Eurocode 8 , 2018 .

[4]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Simplified Frequency Content Estimates of Earthquake Ground Motions , 1998 .

[5]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Using spectral matched records to explore the influence of strong-motion duration on inelastic structural response , 2007 .

[6]  Abbie B. Liel,et al.  Effect of ground motion duration on earthquake-induced structural collapse , 2013 .

[7]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The Influence of Strong-Motion Duration on the Seismic Response of Masonry Structures , 2004 .

[8]  C. Adam,et al.  Dynamic Instabilities of Simple Inelastic Structures Subjected to Earthquake Excitation , 2012 .

[9]  Kuo-Chun Chang,et al.  Ground Motion Duration Effects on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns , 2014 .

[10]  D. Vamvatsikos,et al.  Near‐optimal piecewise linear fits of static pushover capacity curves for equivalent SDOF analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  A State-of-Knowledge Review of the Influence of Strong-Motion Duration on Structural Damage , 2006 .

[12]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[13]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Liquefaction of soil in the Tokyo Bay area from the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake , 2011 .

[14]  W. Silva,et al.  NGA-West2 Database , 2014 .

[15]  Luís C. Neves,et al.  Influence of earthquake ground-motion duration on damage estimation: application to steel moment resisting frames , 2017 .

[16]  M. Sarieddine,et al.  Investigation Correlations between Strong-motion Duration and Structural Damage , 2013 .

[17]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading , 2011 .

[18]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Quantifying the Influence of Ground Motion Duration on Structural Collapse Capacity Using Spectrally Equivalent Records , 2016 .

[19]  A. Elghazouli,et al.  Drift and rotation demands in steel frames incorporating degradation effects , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  A. G. Brady,et al.  A STUDY ON THE DURATION OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1975 .

[21]  Ramón Verdugo,et al.  Liquefaction-induced ground damages during the 2010 Chile earthquake , 2015 .

[22]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences , 2005 .

[23]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  A Database in Support of Modeling of Component Deterioration for Collapse Prediction of Steel Frame Structures , 2007 .

[24]  J B Mander,et al.  Energy Based Methodology for Ductile Design of Concrete Columns , 2001 .

[25]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Dynamic P-Delta Effects for Flexible Inelastic Steel Structures , 2000 .

[26]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Ground motion duration effects on nonlinear seismic response , 2006 .

[27]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[28]  Gary C. Hart,et al.  Simulation of artificial earthquakes , 1973 .

[29]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Development of design spectra for long-duration ground motions from Cascadia subduction earthquakes , 1998 .