Qualifications and turnover of managers and venture capital-financed firm performance: An empirical study of german venture capital-investments

Abstract This study investigates relationships between experience and education aspects of manager qualifications and performance measures in a sample of 103 Portfolio Companies (PC) of German Venture Capital Firms (VCF). In addition, we consider whether lower PC performance induces higher PC manager turnover and if VCF actively influences such PC manager turnover. Bivariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that PC manager qualifications correlate significantly with PC performance. Specifically, characteristics of PC manager experience in marketing/sales, planning/strategy functional areas, as well as in terms of industry experience, were identified as critical success factors. Our findings have substantial implications for VCF management practice: Although deficits in PC manager qualifications were addressed previously both in English and the German language academic literature, to date management practices did not recognize the relevance of such qualifications for investment success and the need to influence PC manager qualifications systematically through tailored selection and development procedures for PC managers. Had the need to compensate for gaps in PC manager qualifications been given adequate priority, our sample would neither contain a high variance for qualification variables nor significant correlations between multiple aspects of PC manager qualifications and success. Therefore, our findings suggest that (German) VCF should in due diligence put more emphasis on (1) PC managers' business functional experience and, unless the PC is active in an entirely new market, (2) a high proportion of managers with experience in the relevant industry. Beyond due diligence, VCF may have to actively realign or replace top managers of PCs in cases where success is substantially below expectations. It is highly likely that there is room for further improvement in this area, in particular in constructing incentives against “living dead” cases, where PCs develop substantially below expectations, but do not fail completely.

[1]  Vijay Karan,et al.  Causes, Consequences, and Shareholder Wealth Effects of Management Turnover: A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 1990 .

[2]  Peter Preisendörfer,et al.  Determinanten der Überlebenschancen neugegründeter Kleinbetriebe , 2003 .

[3]  Robert H. Keeley,et al.  Management, strategy, and industry structure as influences on the success of new firms: a structural model , 1990 .

[4]  Joel K. Leidecker,et al.  Why firms fail , 1987 .

[5]  Harry J. Sapienza,et al.  Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries , 1996 .

[6]  Hollister B. Sykes.  The anatomy of a corporate venturing program: Factors influencing success , 1986 .

[7]  S. Shane,et al.  A PRISONER'S DILEMMA APPROACH TO ENTREPRENEUR-VENTURE CAPITALIST RELATIONSHIPS , 1997 .

[8]  Sören Salomo,et al.  Die Veränderung der wirtschaftlichen Lage im Verlauf eines Wechsels an der Unternehmensspitze , 1998 .

[9]  J. Lerner,et al.  Venture Capital and New Technology Based Firms: An US-German Comparison , 1996 .

[10]  G. Willard,et al.  In order to grow, must the founder go: A comparison of performance between founder and non-founder managed high-growth manufacturing firms , 1992 .

[11]  Robert H. Keeley,et al.  Predictors of success in new technology based ventures , 1990 .

[12]  E. Hotchkiss.  Postbankruptcy Performance and Management Turnover , 1995 .

[13]  A. Kalleberg,et al.  Gender and Organizational Performance: Determinants of Small Business Survival and Success , 1991 .

[14]  G. Willard,et al.  Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms , 1990 .

[15]  Marianne Kulicke,et al.  Beteiligungskapital für junge Technologieunternehmen : Ergebnisse eines Modellversuchs , 1996 .

[16]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process , 1987 .

[17]  C. Olofsson,et al.  Are venture capitalists firefighters? A study of the influence and impact of venture capital firms , 1997 .

[18]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth , 1985 .

[19]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Top management teams and corporate success in an emerging industry , 1986 .

[20]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance , 1994 .

[21]  P. Dubini.  Which venture capital backed entrepreneurs have the best chances of succeeding , 1989 .

[22]  R. Sweeting,et al.  A UK `Hands-off' Venture Capital Firm and the Handling of Post-investment Investor--Investee Relationships† , 1997 .

[23]  W. A. Sahlman,et al.  The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations , 1990 .

[24]  John C. Ruhnka,et al.  The "living dead" phenomenon in venture capital investments , 1992 .

[25]  Gaylen N. Chandler,et al.  The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance , 1992 .

[26]  Ingo Zemke.  Die Unternehmensverfassung von Beteiligungskapital-Gesellschaften : Analyse des institutionellen Designs deutscher Venture Capital-Gesellschaften , 1995 .

[27]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Effects of executive departures on the performance of acquired firms , 1993 .

[28]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .