The Use of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials to Determine the Relationship Between Patient Positioning and Impending Upper Extremity Nerve Injury During Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis

Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring is used to prevent nerve damage in spine surgery and to detect changes in upper extremity nerve function. Upper extremity SSEP conduction changes may indicate impending nerve injury. We investigated the effect of operative positioning on upper extremity nerve function retrospectively in 1000 consecutive spine surgeries that used SSEP monitoring. The vast majority (92%) of upper extremity SSEP changes were reversed by modifying the arm position and were therefore classified as position-related. The incidence of position-related upper extremity SSEP changes was calculated and compared for five different surgical positions: supine arms out, supine arms tucked, lateral decubitus position, prone arms tucked, and the prone “superman” position. The overall incidence of position-related upper extremity SSEP changes was 6.1%. The lateral decubitus position (7.5%) and prone superman position (7.0%) had a significantly more frequent incidence of position-related upper extremity SSEP changes (P < 0.0001, Z-test for Poisson counts) compared with other positions (1.8%–3.2%). No patient with a reversible SSEP change developed a new postoperative deficit in the affected extremity. SSEP monitoring is of value in identifying and reversing impending upper extremity peripheral nerve injury.

[1]  K. Poterack,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potentials are not a sensitive indicator of potential positioning injury in the prone patient , 1996, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[2]  Ronald D. Miller.  Miller's Anesthesia , 2005 .

[3]  A. Curt,et al.  Reliability of perioperative SSEP recordings in spine surgery , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[4]  N. R. Connelly,et al.  Survey of anesthesia practice in spine surgery patients in the United States , 2003, Journal of Anesthesia.

[5]  R. Prielipp,et al.  Ulnar nerve injury and perioperative arm positioning. , 2002, Anesthesiology clinics of North America.

[6]  M. Coppieters,et al.  Positioning in Anesthesiology: Toward a Better Understanding of Stretch-induced Perioperative Neuropathies , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[7]  D. M. Schwartz,et al.  Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[8]  W. Mills,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during closed humeral nailing: a preliminary report. , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  F. Walker,et al.  Ulnar nerve pressure: influence of arm position and relationship to somatosensory evoked potentials. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[10]  R. Caplan.  Will we ever understand perioperative neuropathy? A fresh approach offers hope and insight. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[11]  W. Jellish,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring used to compare the effect of three asymmetric sternal retractors on brachial plexus function. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  W. Jellish,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring used to compare the effect of three asymmetric sternal retractors on brachial plexus function. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  D. Hutchinson,et al.  Rapid Onset of Ulnar Nerve Dysfunction During Transient Occlusion of the Brachial Artery , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  J. T. Martin,et al.  Ulnar Neuropathy: Incidence, Outcome, and Risk Factors in Sedated or Anesthetized Patients , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[15]  W. Jellish,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the brachial plexus to predict nerve injury during internal mammary artery harvest: intraoperative comparisons of the Rultract and Pittman sternal retractors. , 1994, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[16]  L. Lenke,et al.  Evoked potential monitoring of the upper extremities during thoracic and lumbar spinal deformity surgery: a prospective study. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[17]  N. Epstein,et al.  Evaluation of Intraoperative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring During 100 Cervical Operations , 1993, Spine.

[18]  J. Mark,et al.  Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring Predicts Peripheral Nerve Injury during Cardiac Surgery , 1993, Anesthesiology.

[19]  R. Caplan,et al.  Nerve injury associated with anesthesia. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[20]  F. Reckling,et al.  Intraoperative cortical somatosensory evoked potentials for detection of sciatic neuropathy during total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[21]  A Koht,et al.  Effects of Etomidate, Midazolam, and Thiopental on Median Nerve Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and the Additive Effects of Fentanyl and Nitrous Oxide , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[22]  M. Pitman,et al.  The use of somatosensory evoked potentials for detection of neuropraxia during shoulder arthroscopy. , 1988, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[23]  T. Sloan,et al.  Neurologic monitoring. , 1988, Critical care clinics.

[24]  M. Mahla,et al.  Detection of brachial plexus dysfunction by somatosensory evoked potential monitoring--a report of two cases. , 1984, Anesthesiology.