Nondestructive analysis of urinary calculi using micro computed tomography

BackgroundMicro computed tomography (micro CT) has been shown to provide exceptionally high quality imaging of the fine structural detail within urinary calculi. We tested the idea that micro CT might also be used to identify the mineral composition of urinary stones non-destructively.MethodsMicro CT x-ray attenuation values were measured for mineral that was positively identified by infrared microspectroscopy (FT-IR). To do this, human urinary stones were sectioned with a diamond wire saw. The cut surface was explored by FT-IR and regions of pure mineral were evaluated by micro CT to correlate x-ray attenuation values with mineral content. Additionally, intact stones were imaged with micro CT to visualize internal morphology and map the distribution of specific mineral components in 3-D.ResultsMicro CT images taken just beneath the cut surface of urinary stones showed excellent resolution of structural detail that could be correlated with structure visible in the optical image mode of FT-IR. Regions of pure mineral were not difficult to find by FT-IR for most stones and such regions could be localized on micro CT images of the cut surface. This was not true, however, for two brushite stones tested; in these, brushite was closely intermixed with calcium oxalate. Micro CT x-ray attenuation values were collected for six minerals that could be found in regions that appeared to be pure, including uric acid (3515 – 4995 micro CT attenuation units, AU), struvite (7242 – 7969 AU), cystine (8619 – 9921 AU), calcium oxalate dihydrate (13815 – 15797 AU), calcium oxalate monohydrate (16297 – 18449 AU), and hydroxyapatite (21144 – 23121 AU). These AU values did not overlap. Analysis of intact stones showed excellent resolution of structural detail and could discriminate multiple mineral types within heterogeneous stones.ConclusionsMicro CT gives excellent structural detail of urinary stones, and these results demonstrate the feasibility of identifying and localizing most of the common mineral types found in urinary calculi using laboratory CT.

[1]  G M Preminger,et al.  Acoustic and mechanical properties of renal calculi: implications in shock wave lithotripsy. , 1993, Journal of endourology.

[2]  S. Dretler,et al.  Cystine calculi--rough and smooth: a new clinical distinction. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[3]  G M Preminger,et al.  Mechanisms of differing stone fragility in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. , 1994, Journal of endourology.

[4]  R. Mezrich.  Sixteen-section multi-detector row CT scanners: this changes everything. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[5]  G. Preminger,et al.  Characterization of fracture toughness of renal calculi using a microindentation technique , 1993 .

[6]  P. Koshy,et al.  A study of the ultrastructure of urinary calculi by scanning electron microscopy , 2004, Urological Research.

[7]  G Allan Johnson,et al.  Optimization of eight-element multi-detector row helical CT technology for evaluation of the abdomen. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  G. Preminger,et al.  Microhardness measurements of renal calculi: regional differences and effects of microstructure. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  Ahmet Nayir,et al.  Determination of urinary calculi by binocular stereoscopic microscopy , 2002, Pediatric Nephrology.

[10]  R. Hackett,et al.  Microstructure of decalcified human calcium oxalate urinary stones. , 1984, Scanning electron microscopy.

[11]  James E Lingeman,et al.  Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. , 2003, Urology.

[12]  B. Lacour,et al.  Sex- and age-related composition of 10 617 calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy , 2004, Urological Research.

[13]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[14]  S. Dretler,et al.  Stone fragility--a new therapeutic distinction. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[15]  E. Prien,et al.  Crystallographic analysis of urinary calculi: a 23-year survey study. , 1963, The Journal of urology.

[16]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  James E Lingeman,et al.  Helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using high-resolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. , 2004, Urology.

[18]  A. Hesse,et al.  Characterisation of urinary crystals and thin polished sections of urinary calculi by means of an optical microscopic and scanning electron microscopic arrangement. , 1981, Urologia internationalis.

[19]  J. Lingeman,et al.  The clinical implications of brushite calculi. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[20]  J. Resau,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy of urinary stone as a diagnostic tool. , 1984, Scanning electron microscopy.

[21]  R. Paterson,et al.  High resolution detection of internal structure of renal calculi by helical computerized tomography. , 2002, The Journal of urology.