Challenging information foraging theory: screen reader users are not always driven by information scent

Little is known about the navigation tactics employed by screen reader users when they face problematic situations on the Web. Understanding how these tactics are operationalised and knowing the situations that bring about such tactics paves the way towards modeling navigation behaviour. Modeling the navigation of users is of utmost importance as it allows not only to predict interactive behaviour, but also to assess the appropriateness of the content in a link, the information architecture of a site and the design of a web page. Current navigation models do not consider the extreme adaptations, namely coping tactics, that screen reader users undergo on the Web. Consequently, their prediction power is lessened and coping tactics are mistakenly considered outlying behaviours. We draw from existing navigation models for sighted users to suggest the incorporation of emerging behaviours in navigation models for screen reader users. To do so, we identify the navigation coping tactics screen reader users exhibit on the Web, including deliberately clicking on low scented links, escaping from useless or inaccessible content and backtracking to a shelter. Our findings suggest that, especially in problematic situations, navigation is not driven by information scent or utility, but by the need of increasing autonomy and the need of escaping from the current web patch.

[1]  Craig S. Miller,et al.  Modeling Information Navigation: Implications for Information Architecture , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Marilyn Hughes Blackmon,et al.  Cognitive walkthrough for the web , 2002, CHI.

[3]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability , 2007, TCHI.

[4]  Pamela Effrein Sandstrom,et al.  Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  André Pimenta Freire,et al.  Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web , 2012, CHI.

[6]  Markel Vigo,et al.  Coping tactics employed by visually disabled users on the web , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[8]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Good Enough But I'll Just Check: Web-page Search as Attentional Refocusing , 2004, ICCM.

[9]  P. Bednekoff Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach based on State , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Self-Regulation and Link Selection Strategies in Hypertext , 2010 .

[11]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  From x-rays to silly putty via Uranus: serendipity and its role in web search , 2009, CHI.

[12]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 , 2008 .

[13]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  The travails of visually impaired web travellers , 2000, HYPERTEXT '00.

[14]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Evaluating DANTE: Semantic transcoding for visually disabled users , 2007, TCHI.

[15]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site , 2000, CHI.

[16]  Marilyn Hughes Blackmon,et al.  A Comprehension-based Model of Web Navigation and Its Application to Web Usability Analysis , 2000, BCS HCI.

[17]  Ion Juvina,et al.  Using a cognitive model to generate web navigation support , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  SNIF-ACT: A Cognitive Model of User Navigation on the World Wide Web , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Martin Schrepp,et al.  GOMS analysis as a tool to investigate the usability of web units for disabled users , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[20]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Strategies for Guiding Interactive Search: An Empirical Investigation Into the Consequences of Label Relevance for Assessment and Selection , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[22]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  Towards a tool for keystroke level modeling of skilled screen reading , 2010, ASSETS '10.