Transit least-squares survey

The Sun-like star Kepler-160 (KOI-456) has been known to host two transiting planets, Kepler-160 b and c, of which planet c shows substantial transit-timing variations (TTVs). We studied the transit photometry and the TTVs of this system in our search for a suspected third planet. We used the archival Kepler photometry of Kepler-160 to search for additional transiting planets using a combination of our Wōtan detrending algorithm and our transit least-squares detection algorithm. We also used the Mercury N-body gravity code to study the orbital dynamics of the system in trying to explain the observed TTVs of planet c. First, we recovered the known transit series of planets Kepler-160 b and c. Then we found a new transiting candidate with a radius of 1.91−0.14+0.17 Earth radii (R⊕), an orbital period of 378.417−0.025+0.028 d, and Earth-like insolation. The vespa software predicts that this signal has an astrophysical false-positive probability of FPP3 = 1.8 × 10−3 when the multiplicity of the system is taken into account. Kepler vetting diagnostics yield a multiple event statistic of MES = 10.7, which corresponds to an ~85% reliability against false alarms due to instrumental artifacts such as rolling bands. We are also able to explain the observed TTVs of planet c with the presence of a previously unknown planet. The period and mass of this new planet, however, do not match the period and mass of the new transit candidate. Our Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations of the TTVs of Kepler-160 c can be conclusively explained by a new nontransiting planet with a mass between about 1 and 100 Earth masses and an orbital period between about 7 and 50 d. We conclude that Kepler-160 has at least three planets, one of which is the nontransiting planet Kepler-160 d. The expected stellar radial velocity amplitude caused by this new planet ranges between about 1 and 20 m s−1. We also find the super-Earth-sized transiting planet candidate KOI-456.04 in the habitable zone of this system, which could be the fourth planet.

[1]  M. Hippke,et al.  Optimized transit detection algorithm to search for periodic transits of small planets , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[2]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  Revised Stellar Properties of Kepler Targets for the Q1-17 (DR25) Transit Detection Run , 2016, 1609.04128.

[3]  Ryan C. Terrien,et al.  HABITABLE ZONES AROUND MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS: NEW ESTIMATES , 2013, 1301.6674.

[4]  Gottingen,et al.  Transit least-squares survey , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[5]  Michael Wegner,et al.  Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , 2010 .

[6]  M. Cropper,et al.  Gaia Data Release 2 , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[7]  Mark S. Marley,et al.  Planetary Radii across Five Orders of Magnitude in Mass and Stellar Insolation: Application to Transits , 2006 .

[8]  G. Mulders,et al.  Wōtan: Comprehensive Time-series Detrending in Python , 2019, The Astronomical Journal.

[9]  Khadeejah A. Zamudio,et al.  DETECTION OF POTENTIAL TRANSIT SIGNALS IN 17 QUARTERS OF KEPLER DATA: RESULTS OF THE FINAL KEPLER MISSION TRANSITING PLANET SEARCH (DR25) , 2016, 1604.06140.

[10]  E. Agol,et al.  VALIDATION OF KEPLER'S MULTIPLE PLANET CANDIDATES. III. LIGHT CURVE ANALYSIS AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF HUNDREDS OF NEW MULTI-PLANET SYSTEMS , 2014, 1402.6534.

[11]  G. Bruce Berriman,et al.  Astrophysics Source Code Library , 2012, ArXiv.

[12]  T. Morton.  AN EFFICIENT AUTOMATED VALIDATION PROCEDURE FOR EXOPLANET TRANSIT CANDIDATES , 2012, 1206.1568.

[13]  R. Heller.  Analytic solutions to the maximum and average exoplanet transit depth for common stellar limb darkening laws , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[14]  Vivekananda Roy,et al.  Convergence Diagnostics for Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[15]  Gaia Collaboration,et al.  The Gaia mission , 2016, 1609.04153.

[16]  Jessie L. Dotson,et al.  Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python , 2018 .

[17]  S. Dreizler,et al.  Kepler Object of Interest Network , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[18]  Khadeejah A. Zamudio,et al.  Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler. VIII. A Fully Automated Catalog with Measured Completeness and Reliability Based on Data Release 25 , 2017, The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series.

[19]  Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak,et al.  Flagging and correction of pattern noise in the Kepler focal plane array , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[20]  Tsevi Mazeh,et al.  TRANSIT TIMING OBSERVATIONS FROM KEPLER. IX. CATALOG OF THE FULL LONG-CADENCE DATA SET , 2016, 1606.01744.

[21]  J. Chambers.  A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies , 1999 .

[22]  J. Kasting,et al.  Habitable zones around main sequence stars. , 1993, Icarus.

[23]  K. Kinemuchi,et al.  ALMOST ALL OF KEPLER'S MULTIPLE-PLANET CANDIDATES ARE PLANETS , 2012, 1201.5424.

[24]  D. Kipping.  Efficient, uninformative sampling of limb darkening coefficients for two-parameter laws , 2013, 1308.0009.

[25]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Superhabitable worlds. , 2014, Astrobiology.

[26]  Frederic Pont,et al.  The effect of red noise on planetary transit detection , 2006, astro-ph/0608597.

[27]  Jeffrey L Coughlin,et al.  Description of the TCERT Vetting Reports for Data Release 25 , 2017 .

[28]  L. Rogers.  MOST 1.6 EARTH-RADIUS PLANETS ARE NOT ROCKY , 2014, 1407.4457.

[29]  J. Scargle.  Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II - Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data , 1982 .

[30]  Peter Tenenbaum,et al.  Identification of Background False Positives from Kepler Data , 2013, 1303.0052.

[31]  G. Kov'acs,et al.  A box-fitting algorithm in the search for periodic transits , 2002, astro-ph/0206099.

[32]  W. Press,et al.  Fast algorithm for spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data , 1989 .

[33]  N. Lomb.  Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data , 1976 .

[34]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[35]  John Asher Johnson,et al.  ROBOTIC LASER ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGING OF 715 KEPLER EXOPLANET CANDIDATES USING ROBO-AO , 2013, 1312.4958.

[36]  Y. Lithwick,et al.  EXTRACTING PLANET MASS AND ECCENTRICITY FROM TTV DATA , 2012, 1207.4192.

[37]  P. Giommi,et al.  The PLATO 2.0 mission , 2013, 1310.0696.

[38]  T. A. Lister,et al.  Gaia Data Release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties , 2018, 1804.09365.

[39]  S. Thompson,et al.  Kepler Archive Manual , 2016 .

[40]  Timothy M. Brown,et al.  KEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION , 2011, 1102.0342.

[41]  Timothy D. Morton,et al.  VESPA: False positive probabilities calculator , 2015 .

[42]  I. Ribas,et al.  Kepler Object of Interest Network , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[43]  M. R. Haas,et al.  FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES FOR ALL KEPLER OBJECTS OF INTEREST: 1284 NEWLY VALIDATED PLANETS AND 428 LIKELY FALSE POSITIVES , 2016, 1605.02825.

[44]  Jean-Louis Lizon,et al.  ESPRESSO: the Echelle spectrograph for rocky exoplanets and stable spectroscopic observations , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[45]  Paul M. Brunet,et al.  The Gaia mission , 2013, 1303.0303.

[46]  P. Szkody,et al.  SPECTROSCOPY OF FAINT KEPLER MISSION EXOPLANET CANDIDATE HOST STARS , 2013, 1305.0578.

[47]  J. Fortney,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE MASS–RADIUS RELATION FOR SUB-NEPTUNES: RADIUS AS A PROXY FOR COMPOSITION , 2013, 1311.0329.

[48]  Jeffrey E. Van Cleve,et al.  Kepler Instrument Handbook , 2016 .

[49]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[50]  W. Cleveland.  LOWESS: A Program for Smoothing Scatterplots by Robust Locally Weighted Regression , 1981 .

[51]  Gottingen,et al.  Transit least-squares survey , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[52]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.

[53]  B. Skiff,et al.  VizieR Online Data Catalog , 2009 .

[54]  O. Aharonson,et al.  A Spectral Approach to Transit Timing Variations , 2017, 1710.10930.

[55]  J. Coughlin.  Kepler : A Search for Terrestrial Planets Description of the TCERT Vetting Reports for Data Release , 2017 .

[56]  E. Agol,et al.  VALIDATION OF KEPLER'S MULTIPLE PLANET CANDIDATES. II. REFINED STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK AND DESCRIPTIONS OF SYSTEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST , 2014, 1402.6352.

[57]  P. Cargile,et al.  The California-Kepler Survey. II. Precise Physical Properties of 2025 Kepler Planets and Their Host Stars , 2017, 1703.10402.

[58]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Some Tests to Establish Confidence in Planets Discovered by Transit Photometry , 2002 .

[59]  F. Mullally,et al.  Kepler’s Earth-like Planets Should Not Be Confirmed without Independent Detection: The Case of Kepler-452b , 2018, 1803.11307.