Life Cycle Assessment in automotive sector: A case study for engine valves towards cleaner production

Abstract Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a well-established tool to analyze environmental aspects and impacts of products and processes. However, there are few studies available regarding LCA of automotive components such as the small parts used by vehicle engines, e.g., intake and exhaust valves. This paper showed a cradle-to-grave LCA of exhaust valves produced in Brazil for automotive use. Based on environmental hotspots of the case study, cleaner production scenarios were developed to reduce environmental burdens and to improve manufacturing eco-efficiency. Thirteen midpoint impact categories were evaluated and more than 90% of all the impacts were due to fuel consumption into the internal combustion engine during the valves use phase. Regarding the valves manufacturing phase, the machining processes applied on the valve stem represented 63% of all the impacts, and they were strongly influenced by the consumption of electric energy, raw materials used in the valve stem and cutting fluid. For this reason, cleaner production scenarios were evaluated and tested in a centerless grinding process of the valve stem. The best cleaner production scenario showed a potential impact reduction up to 72% in the stand-by grinding mode followed by up to 44% less impacts in the dressing mode. Simple changes on grinding parameters produced a huge potential of minimizing environmental burdens in a life cycle perspective, especially in terms of impacts for resources (fossil and minerals) depletion (RD). A comparison between the environmental profiles before and after adopting the proposed cleaner production measures showed a significant reduction of 27% on the RD impacts. Therefore, improvements of the exhaust valve's manufacturing parameters can generate a better environmental life cycle performance towards cleaner production.

[1]  Massimo Delogu,et al.  Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of a lightweight solution for an automotive component: A comparison between talc-filled and hollow glass microspheres-reinforced polymer composites , 2016 .

[2]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: Framework and Requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Models and Indicators , 2010 .

[3]  Jens Warsen,et al.  The Life Cycle Approach at Volkswagen , 2012 .

[4]  Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva,et al.  Green manufacturing: uma análise da produção científica e de tendências para o futuro , 2015 .

[5]  He Xu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of end-of-life vehicle recycling processes in China—take Corolla taxis for example , 2016 .

[6]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Life cycle assessment-based selection of a sustainable lightweight automotive engine hood design , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Environmental Management System ISO 14001 factors for promoting the adoption of Cleaner Production practices , 2016 .

[8]  Jimi Tjong,et al.  Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of hybrid fiber-reinforced engine beauty cover in comparison with glass fiber-reinforced counterpart , 2017 .

[9]  Suk-Hwan Suh,et al.  Process-oriented Life Cycle Assessment framework for environmentally conscious manufacturing , 2017, J. Intell. Manuf..

[10]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Quality tools applied to Cleaner Production programs: a first approach toward a new methodology , 2013 .

[11]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Normalization in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment to Support Environmental Decision Making , 2017 .

[12]  Fuquan Zhao,et al.  Comparing the life cycle Greenhouse Gas emissions from vehicle production in China and the USA: implications for targeting the reduction opportunities , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[13]  Naoki Shibahara,et al.  Comparative assessment on greenhouse gas emissions of end-of-life vehicles recycling methods , 2017 .

[14]  Mark A. McComb The Quality Toolbox , 2008, Technometrics.

[15]  Corinne Reich-Weiser,et al.  Metrics for Green Manufacturing , 2013 .

[16]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI)—CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: Methodology description , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  Sujit Das,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental evaluation of downsized vs. lightweight material automotive engines , 2014 .

[18]  Eraldo Jannone da Silva,et al.  Productive and environmental performance indicators analysis by a combined LCA hybrid model and real-time manufacturing process monitoring: A grinding unit process application , 2017 .

[19]  Johannes Gediga,et al.  Lead industry life cycle studies: environmental impact and life cycle assessment of lead battery and architectural sheet production , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Athulan Vijayaraghavan,et al.  Evaluating the relationship between use phase environmental impacts and manufacturing process precision , 2011 .

[21]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Unit process impact assessment for discrete part manufacturing: A state of the art , 2010 .

[22]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 2: case studies , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  C. M. Taylor,et al.  Automobile engine tribology—design considerations for efficiency and durability , 1998 .

[24]  Amilcar Ramalho,et al.  Effect of temperatures up to 400 °C on the impact-sliding of valve-seat contacts , 2009 .

[25]  Barbara Linke,et al.  Sustainability of abrasive processes , 2013 .

[26]  Remo Augusto Padovezi Filleti Modelo dinâmico de inventário de ciclo de vida (ICV) de processo unitário discreto de manufatura: um estudo de caso com retificação cilíndrica externa , 2015 .

[27]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Moving towards green and sustainable manufacturing , 2014 .

[28]  Barbara Linke,et al.  Establishing greener products and manufacturing processes , 2011 .

[29]  Giovanna Cornacchia,et al.  Cradle-to-Gate Impact Assessment of a High-Pressure Die-Casting Safety-Relevant Automotive Component , 2016 .

[30]  Tiina Pajula,et al.  A specific method for the life cycle inventory of machine tools and its demonstration with two manufacturing case studies , 2014 .

[31]  Tao Li,et al.  Environmental emissions and energy consumptions assessment of a diesel engine from the life cycle perspective , 2013 .

[32]  Omer El Fakir,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the potential environmental benefits of a novel hot forming process in automotive manufacturing , 2014 .

[33]  Chris Yuan,et al.  Introduction to Green Manufacturing , 2013 .

[34]  A. R. Ometto,et al.  How can Cleaner Production practices contribute to meet ISO 14001 requirements? Critical analysis from a survey with industrial companies , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[35]  D. Morrey,et al.  A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of lightweighting strategies for compact vehicles , 2015 .

[36]  D. C. oksey C. Eshelman,et al.  The quality toolbox , 1992 .

[37]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) Part 1: Methodology Description , 2011 .