Interoperability Scenarios to Measure Informal Learning Carried Out in PLEs

Achieving success in the application of Information and Communications Technology to teaching and learning processes can be challenging. One possible reason for this is the failure to take into account the student as end-user when implementing technologies. In particular, student requirements to access different sources of information and collaborate with other students during their learning can be constrained by the nature of institutional technology which presents barriers to integrating formal and informal learning: students do not only learn in the institutional context but from their experiences throughout the course of daily life. Institutional Learning Management Systems are not enough to meet these needs for increased integration of informal learning, technological practice and formal learning. The efforts to develop effective Personal Learning Environments attempt to solve this, providing a space where students can use the tools they want. But this presents a problem with regard to the management and measurement of learning success. This paper poses some interoperability scenarios to allow the assessment of the personalized informal activity, and in this way, obtain measurable information about the advantages of personalization in Learning.

[1]  Charles R. Severance,et al.  The coming functionality mash-up in Personal Learning Environments , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[2]  Stefaan Ternier,et al.  Personalisation of Learning in Virtual Learning Environments , 2009, EC-TEL.

[3]  Denis Gillet,et al.  Mapping Web Personal Learning Environments , 2009, MUPPLE@EC-TEL.

[4]  Dai Griffiths,et al.  Distributing education services to personal and institutional systems using Widgets , 2008 .

[5]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  Carlos Alario-Hoyos,et al.  Comparison of the main alternatives to the integration of external tools in different platforms. , 2010 .

[7]  Mart Laanpere,et al.  Conceptual Design of EduFeedr - an Educationally Enhanced Mash-up Tool for Agora Courses , 2009, MUPPLE@EC-TEL.

[8]  A. Piscitelli El proyecto facebook y la posuniversidad: sistemas operativos sociales y entornos abiertos de aprendizaje , 2010 .

[9]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Toward a Personal Learning Environment Framework , 2010, Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ..

[10]  Yvan Peter,et al.  First steps in the integration of institutional and personal learning environments , 2010 .

[11]  Jordi Adell and Linda Castañeda Los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLEs): una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje , 2010 .

[12]  Manuel Benito,et al.  iPLE Network: an integrated eLearning 2.0 architecture from a university's perspective , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[13]  Graham Attwell,et al.  E-portfolio: the DNa of the Personal Learning Environment? , 2007 .

[14]  David Wiley,et al.  Open for Learning: The CMS and the Open Learning Network , 2009 .

[15]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[16]  Mohammed Al-Zoube,et al.  E-Learning on the Cloud , 2009, Int. Arab. J. e Technol..

[17]  C. Chadwick Computadoras en la educación: problemas y precauciones , 2008 .

[18]  Dai Griffiths,et al.  Moodle Wave: Reinventing the VLE using Widget technologies , 2009, MUPPLE@EC-TEL.

[19]  Niall Sclater,et al.  Web 2.0, personal learning environments and the future of learning management systems , 2008 .

[20]  Stephen Brown,et al.  From VLEs to learning webs: the implications of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[21]  Miguel Á. Conde,et al.  Merging Learning Management Systems and Personal Learning Environments , 2011 .

[22]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Mashups in Learning Design: pushing the flexibility envelope , 2008 .

[23]  M. van Harmelen,et al.  Personal Learning Environments , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[24]  Palitha Edirisingha,et al.  BUILDING WEB 2.0-BASED PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS - A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2008 .

[25]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[26]  Francisco-José García-Peñalvo,et al.  e-Learning Services in Moodle 2.0 , 2011 .

[27]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop MUPPLE’09 , 2009 .

[28]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[29]  Rosabel Roig-Vila,et al.  La integración de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación y la interculturalidad en las aulas , 2010 .

[30]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[31]  Sandra Schaffert,et al.  On the way towards Personal Learning Environments: Seven crucial aspects , 2008 .

[32]  Andrew G. Booth,et al.  A service‐oriented virtual learning environment , 2009 .

[33]  O. Casquero,et al.  iGoogle and gadgets as a platform for integrating institutional and external services , 2008 .

[34]  Mark van Harmelen,et al.  Personal Learning Environments , 2006, ICALT.

[35]  Alejandro Piscitelli and Iván Adaime and Inés Binder El Proyecto Facebook y la Posuniversidad , 2010 .

[36]  Graham Attwell,et al.  Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? , 2007 .

[37]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Opening Learning Management Systems to Personal Learning Environments , 2011, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[38]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Interoperability for LMS: the missing piece to become the common place for e-learning innovation , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..