Effect of Surgery Start Time on Day of Discharge in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Patients

Study Design. Retrospective cohort. Objective. To compare time to discharge for anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDF) when performed as either a first case versus later surgical start times. Summary of Background Data. ACDF is a commonly performed spinal procedure that typically has a short acute recovery period. With an increasing focus on reducing hospital costs and a shift toward outpatient surgical practices, early patient discharge has become a priority for hospitals and physicians alike. However, the impact of surgery start time on the ability for same-day discharge has not been explored in spine surgery. Methods. A surgical database of patients who underwent ACDF from 2013 to 2015 was reviewed. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: those whose surgery was the first of the day (early cohort), and those who underwent later surgeries. Baseline patient characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between cohorts using Student t test and &khgr;2 test. Same-day discharge was tested for association with surgical start time using Poisson regression with robust error variance controlling for preoperative variables. Results. A total of 106 patients, divided into early and late cohorts of 60 and 46 patients, respectively, were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in pre- or perioperative characteristics between cohorts (Table 1). Same-day discharge was achieved in 36.8% (n = 39) of all ACDF patients. The later cohort was significantly more likely to require an overnight stay compared with the early cohort (RR = 1.61 ± 0.30; P = 0.010). TABLE 1 Baseline Characteristics by Surgery Start Time Conclusion. Patients undergoing ACDF later in the day are at a higher risk for staying overnight than those who have the first surgery of the day. These results may influence operative scheduling, as performing ACDFs early in the day may result in a greater likelihood of same-day discharge, eliminating the increased resource utilization associated with an overnight hospital stay. Level of Evidence: 4

[1]  S. Missios,et al.  Hospitalization cost after spine surgery in the United States of America , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[2]  N. Fleming,et al.  Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  S. Stein,et al.  Development of an outpatient protocol for lumbar discectomy: our institutional experience. , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[4]  S. Missios,et al.  Selection of patients for ambulatory lumbar discectomy: results from four US states. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease , 2014, Global spine journal.

[6]  R. Barakat,et al.  The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  Marcus E. Semel,et al.  Contemporary predictors of extended postoperative hospital length of stay after carotid endarterectomy. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  D. Finley,et al.  Impact of surgical case order on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy , 2014, Urology annals.

[9]  E. Helseth,et al.  Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disk disease: a prospective consecutive series of 96 patients , 2013, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[10]  W. Young,et al.  Instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: is it safe? , 2012, International surgery.

[11]  J. Schorge,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: why don't all patients go home the day after surgery? , 2011, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[12]  L. Gien,et al.  Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. , 2011, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  J. Akoh,et al.  Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: reducing the admission rate. , 2011, International journal of surgery.

[14]  R. Wohns Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient cervical disc arthroplasty , 2010, Surgical neurology international.

[15]  R. Sasso,et al.  Safety of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed as Outpatient Surgery , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[16]  J. Friedman,et al.  Comparison of inpatient vs. outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective case series , 2009, BMC surgery.

[17]  E. Helseth,et al.  Immediate (0–6 h), early (6–72 h) and late (>72 h) complications after anterior cervical discectomy with fusion for cervical disc degeneration; discharge six hours after operation is feasible , 2008, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[18]  A. McGee,et al.  Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. , 2007, American journal of orthopedics.

[19]  A. Villavicencio,et al.  The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[20]  J. Chi,et al.  General considerations for cervical arthroplasty with technique for ProDisc-C. , 2005, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[21]  J. Stieber,et al.  Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with plate fixation as an outpatient procedure. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[22]  E. Moore,et al.  Predicting failure of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 2002, American Journal of Surgery.

[23]  T. Whitecloud,et al.  A cost analysis of two anterior cervical fusion procedures. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[24]  L. Blumenson,et al.  Day surgery for cervical microdiscectomy: is it safe and effective? , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.