Call matching in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana)

Abstract Males of the quacking frog Crinia georgiana produce calls consisting of 1–11 notes. Playback experiments using synthetic calls showed that males tend to match the number of notes in 2-note and 4-note stimuli; however, males tended to produce more than 1 note in response to a 1-note stimulus and fewer than 8 notes in response to an 8-note stimulus. Successive playbacks of two, 4-note calls from separate speakers indicate that males are likely to match the combined number of notes in the calls of two neighbors, even if they are not equidistant from the focal male. The results are compared with the few other studies of matching in anurans, and interpreted in terms of hypotheses developed to explain matching in songbirds. One attractive and testable hypothesis for call matching in C. georgiana is that males are attempting to produce calls that are at least as attractive to females as those of rivals, without wasting energy.

[1]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  T. Grafe.  Energetics of vocalization in the African reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus). , 1996, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Physiology.

[3]  N. Passmore,et al.  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MULTI-NOTE ADVERTISEMENT CALLS IN A REED FROG,HYPEROLIUS TUBERILINGUIS , 1989 .

[4]  J. Roberts,et al.  Simultaneous mating with multiple males reduces fertilization success in the myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[6]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Cooperation and Conflict in the Evolution of Signal Interactions , 1994 .

[7]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  The function of call alternation in the African reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus): precise call timing prevents auditory masking , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  K. Wells,et al.  Intra- and Interspecific Vocal Behavior of the Neotropical Treefrog Hyla microcephala , 1985 .

[9]  H. Lindman.  Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs , 1974 .

[10]  Michael Rosen,et al.  The Vocal Behavior of Spring Peepers, Hyla crucifer , 1974 .

[11]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[12]  A. Arak,et al.  Graded call variation in male Asian cricket frogs (Rana nicobariensis) , 1998 .

[13]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .

[14]  A. Arak.  Vocal interactions, call matching and territoriality in a Sri Lankan treefrog, Philautus leucorhinus (Rhacophoridae) , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  K. Wells,et al.  Vocal behavior of the neotropical treefrog Hyla phlebodes , 1984 .

[16]  N. Passmore,et al.  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MULTI-NOTE ADVERTISEMENT CALLS IN A REED FROG, HYPEROLIUS TUBERILING UIS , 1988 .

[17]  L. Simmons,et al.  CALLING SONGS OF FIELD CRICKETS (TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS) WITH AND WITHOUT PHONOTACTIC PARASITOID INFECTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Mechanisms and Function of Call-Timing in Male-Male Interactions in Frogs , 1992 .

[19]  J. Tukey,et al.  Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square Root , 1950 .

[20]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Song matching in the great tit Parus major L. , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  R. Standish,et al.  Synchronous polyandry and multiple paternity in the frogCrinia georgiana(Anura: Myobatrachidae) , 1999, Animal Behaviour.