Effects of nicotine on subjective arousal may be dependent on baseline subjective state.

The often disparate and contrasting effects of nicotine on subjective arousal in smokers may be due in part to differences in presmoking subjective state. In Study 1, on each of 2 days, 10 male smokers were divided into high- and low-baseline subgroups on the basis of median split of resting predrug baseline subjective arousal. Then, subjects received intermittent nicotine (15 mu/kg) or placebo via measured-dose nasal spray, with drug conditions counterbalanced between days. In Study 2, 32 male and female smokers were similarly divided into high- and low-baseline subgroups on subjective arousal prior to either smoking or sham-smoking (n = 16 each) during a single session. Results were virtually identical between studies in showing that subjective arousal responses to nicotine (Study 1) or smoking (Study 2) were significantly inversely related to baseline arousal level; those initially low in arousal showed large increases following nicotine or smoking whereas those high in arousal showed little change. No such baseline dependency of responses was seen following placebo or sham smoking. Baseline dependency of cardiovascular responses to nicotine or smoking was also evaluated in similar fashion to determine generalizability of these effects to nonsubjective responses. In each study, systolic blood pressure response was related to baseline level but there was no effect of baseline level on heart rate and diastolic blood pressure responses. Implications of these results for explaining differential rewarding effects of smoking are discussed.

[1]  G. Wenger,et al.  Rate-Dependency of the Behavioral Effects of Amphetamine , 1977 .

[2]  R J West,et al.  Nicotine pharmacodynamics: some unresolved issues. , 1990, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[3]  R. Michael,et al.  Task-specific effects of nicotine in rats Intracranial self-stimulation and locomotor activity , 1986, Neuropharmacology.

[4]  C. Pomerleau,et al.  Neuroregulators and the reinforcement of smoking: Towards a biobehavioral explanation , 1984, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[5]  J. Henningfield,et al.  Abuse liability and pharmacodynamic characteristics of intravenous and inhaled nicotine. , 1985, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[6]  Kenneth A. Perkins,et al.  An aerosol spray alternative to cigarette smoking in the study of the behavioral and physiological effects of nicotine , 1986 .

[7]  Bradley E. Huitema,et al.  The analysis of covariance and alternatives , 1980 .

[8]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Paradoxical tranquilizing and emotion-reducing effects of nicotine. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  J. Wilder,et al.  BASIMETRIC APPROACH (LAW OF INITIAL VALUE) TO BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. Rosecrans Effects of nicotine on behavioral arousal and brain 5-hydroxytryptamine function in female rats selected for differences in activity. , 1971, European journal of pharmacology.

[11]  M. Jarvik,et al.  Cigarette smoking during anxiety-provoking and monotonous tasks. , 1983, Addictive behaviors.

[12]  J. Pierri,et al.  Individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses to alcohol. , 1987, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[13]  G. Mangan,et al.  The Psychopharmacology of Smoking , 1984 .