A Privacy Policy Comparison of Health and Fitness Related Mobile Applications

[1]  A. Schuchat.  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES , 2015 .

[2]  J. Reeve,et al.  Solutions to problematic polypharmacy: learning from the expertise of patients. , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[3]  L. Cranor,et al.  Are They Worth Reading? An In-Depth Analysis of Online Trackers’ Privacy Policies , 2015 .

[4]  Michael J. Miller,et al.  Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. , 2013, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[5]  Joseph Conn.  Users beware. Leaks from health websites, apps cause for concern. , 2013, Modern healthcare.

[6]  Gabriele Meiselwitz,et al.  Readability Assessment of Policies and Procedures of Social Networking Sites , 2013, HCI.

[7]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  An Online Survey Experiment on Ambiguity and Privacy , 2012 .

[8]  Neeli R. Prasad,et al.  People-centric sensing in assistive healthcare: Privacy challenges and directions , 2011, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[9]  Kyung Sup Kwak,et al.  Security and Privacy Issues in Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare Applications , 2010, Journal of Medical Systems.

[10]  Elsevier Sdol,et al.  Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy , 2009 .

[11]  Jennifer King,et al.  What Californians Understand about Privacy Online , 2008 .

[12]  Amy S. Hedman,et al.  Using the SMOG Formula to Revise a Health-Related Document , 2008 .

[13]  William H. DuBay.  The Principles of Readability. , 2004 .

[14]  David A. Kindig,et al.  Health literacy : a prescription to end confusion , 2004 .

[15]  M. Graber,et al.  Reading level of privacy policies on Internet health Web sites. , 2002, The Journal of family practice.

[16]  G. Harry McLaughlin,et al.  SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula. , 1969 .