Experimental Designs for Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Technology

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) technology is commonly used to estimate genome-wide copy-number variation and to evaluate associations between copy number and disease. Although aCGH technology is well developed and there are numerous algorithms available for estimating copy number, little attention has been paid to the important issue of the statistical experimental design. Herein, we review classical statistical experimental designs and discuss their relevance to aCGH technology as well as their importance for downstream statistical analyses. Furthermore, we provide experimental design guidance for various study objectives.

[1]  J. Byrd,et al.  Progressive but previously untreated CLL patients with greater array CGH complexity exhibit a less durable response to chemoimmunotherapy. , 2010, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[2]  Leslie G Biesecker,et al.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Luminita Moruz,et al.  Molecular karyotyping of patients with unexplained mental retardation by SNP arrays: A multicenter study , 2009, Human mutation.

[4]  Sjoerd J. Vosse,et al.  Across array comparative genomic hybridization: A strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations , 2008, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[5]  T. Therneau,et al.  Experimental design and analysis of antibody microarrays: applying methods from cDNA arrays. , 2005, Cancer research.

[6]  G. Churchill Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[7]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Design of studies using DNA microarrays , 2002, Genetic epidemiology.

[8]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[9]  G. Churchill,et al.  Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data. , 2007, Genetical research.

[10]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[11]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..