Form Function Fidelity

Engineering goals are typically rooted in addressing the functional needs of a product. While these engineering goals and specifications can be important in consumers’ buying decisions, many times the first impression of the product comes from judgments of the product’s aesthetic form. For this reason, this paper set out to study how well human judgment of performance based on a car’s shape correlates with the actual measured performance of the car’s shape, and what features of the car’s shape most influence this judgment. More specifically, participants were asked to rate how aerodynamic, sporty, fuel efficient, and rugged a computer generated car design appeared to them, and these ratings were analyzed against the actual aerodynamics of the vehicle as well as key indicators of sportiness and cornering stability such as center of gravity and wheel stance. The inter-rater consistency of human judgments was also studied. Using this human judgment data, the attributes in car design with the greatest effect on participant judgment of vehicle performance were identified, and were compared against their importance and effect in actual vehicle performance. Analysis of this data gives key insights about how car designers can create designs that better convey the desired goals of a car to consumers while also meeting those performance goals.© 2011 ASME

[1]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Methodology for Quantifying the Perceived Environmental Friendliness of Vehicle Silhouettes in Engineering Design , 2009 .

[2]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function , 2009 .

[3]  T. Murakami,et al.  Factors Affecting Viewpoint Shifts When Evaluating Shape Aesthetics: Towards Extracting Customer’s Latent Needs of Emotional Quality , 2008 .

[4]  Sofiane Achiche,et al.  Mapping Shape Geometry and Emotions Using Fuzzy Logic , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Navigating in a Shape Space of Registered Models , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Measurement of Headlight Form Preference Using a Choice Based Conjoint Analysis , 2007, DAC 2007.

[7]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[8]  Wei Chen,et al.  Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design , 2005 .

[9]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Design engineering competencies: future requirements and predicted changes in the forthcoming decade , 2005 .

[10]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Evaluative Aspects of Creative Thought: Effects of Appraisal and Revision Standards , 2004 .

[11]  Jay McCormack,et al.  Speaking the Buick Language: Capturing, Understanding, and Exploring Brand Identity With Shape Grammars , 2004 .

[12]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  A morphing method for shape generation and image prediction in product design , 2002 .

[13]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Capturing a rebel: modeling the Harley-Davidson brand through a motorcycle shape grammar , 2002 .

[14]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[16]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[17]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[18]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Blend of Different Tastes: The Language of Coffeemakers , 1998 .

[19]  D. E. Calkins,et al.  CDAERO : A PARAMETRIC AERODYNAMIC DRAG PREDICTION TOOL , 1998 .

[20]  Samuel P. Huntington,et al.  Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress , 2001 .

[21]  Gülen Çağdaş,et al.  A Shape Grammar: The Language of Traditional Turkish Houses , 1996 .

[22]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[23]  M. Mumford,et al.  Putting Creativity to Work: Effects of Leader Behavior on Subordinate Creativity , 1993 .

[24]  Stuart Ewen,et al.  All Consuming Images: The Politics Of Style In Contemporary Culture , 1990 .

[25]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2005 .

[26]  G. Stiny Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars , 1980 .

[27]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  The Palladian Grammar , 1978 .

[29]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[30]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .