Promoting intermodal connectivity at California's high-speed rail stations.

One of high-speed rail (HSR’s) biggest advantages over air travel is that it offers passengers a one-seat ride into the center of major cities, providing ample opportunities for intermodal transfers at these locales. Thus, HSR passengers are typically able to arrive at stations that are only a short walk away from central business districts and major tourist attractions, without experiencing any of the stress that car drivers often experience in negotiating such highly congested environments. Such an approach requires a high level of coordination and planning of the infrastructural and spatial aspects of the HSR service, and a high degree of intermodal connectivity. But what key elements can help the US HSR system blend successfully with other existing rail and transit services? This study seeks to understand the requirements for high levels of connectivity and spatial and operational integration of HSR stations and offer recommendations for seamless, and convenient integrated service in California intercity rail/HSR stations. The study draws data from a review of the literature on the connectivity, intermodality, and spatial and operational integration of transit systems; a survey of 26 high-speed rail experts from six different European countries; and an in-depth look at the German and Spanish blended HSR systems and some of their stations, which are deemed as exemplary models of station connectivity. The study offers recommendations on how to enhance both the spatial and the operational connectivity of high-speed rail systems, particularly blended systems.

[1]  Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris,et al.  Impact of High Speed Rail Stations on Local Development: A Delphi Survey , 2012 .

[2]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Study on Optimal Frequency Design Problem for Multimodal Network Using Probit-Based User Equilibrium Assignment , 2005 .

[3]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Network Connectivity , 2010 .

[4]  Jordi Martí-Henneberg,et al.  Characterizing European high speed train stations using intermodal time and entropy metrics , 2009 .

[5]  Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris,et al.  Planning for Complementarity: An Examination of the Role and Opportunities of First-Tier and Second-Tier Cities Along the High-Speed Rail Network in California , 2012 .

[6]  Andrew Nash Best Practices in Shared-Use High-Speed Rail Systems , 2003 .

[7]  David Lehlbach How Shared Use Can Pay Off , 2010 .

[8]  Deike Peters Digging through the Heart of Reunified Berlin: Unbundling the Decision-Making Process for the Tiergarten-Tunnel Mega-Project , 2010 .

[9]  Francesc Robusté,et al.  High-Speed Railways in Spain , 2011 .

[10]  Qing Shen,et al.  Intermodal Transfer between Bicycles and Rail Transit in Shanghai, China , 2010 .

[11]  Andrew Nash,et al.  Increasing Rail Demand by Improving Multimodal Information and Ticketing , 2009 .

[12]  C E Eberhard TRANS-EUROPEAN RAIL FREIGHT FREEWAYS AS CATALYSTS FOR AN INTEGRATED EUROPEAN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM , 1997 .

[13]  Dickson K. W. Chiu,et al.  A Multi-Modal Agent Based Mobile Route Advisory System for Public Transport Network , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Timothy F Welch,et al.  Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal transportation networks , 2012 .

[15]  Hugo Priemus,et al.  Railway development : Impacts on urban dynamics , 2008 .

[16]  Andrea Lubin,et al.  Quantifying Patron Needs at Intermodal Facilities , 2011 .

[17]  Deike Peters,et al.  The Renaissance of Inner-City Rail Station Areas: A Key Element in Contemporary Urban Restructuring Dynamics , 2009 .

[18]  Thobias Sando,et al.  A Proposed Procedure for Developing Transit Station Design Criteria With a Focus on Intermodal Connectivity , 2009 .

[19]  Ronald A. Mayville,et al.  Moving toward Unrestricted Shared Use , 2011 .

[20]  Rob van Nes,et al.  Path Size Modeling in Multimodal Route Choice Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  David Banister,et al.  THE SECOND RAILWAY AGE , 1994 .

[22]  Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris New Rail Hubs along High-Speed Rail Corridor in California , 2013 .

[23]  Pasi Lautala,et al.  Review of Capacity Measurement Methodologies: Similarities and Differences in U.S. and European Railroads , 2013 .

[24]  Xiao Kuan Yang,et al.  Rail Transit-Based Planning and Design of Park-and-Ride Facilities in Beijing , 2013 .

[25]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation , 2007 .

[26]  C Green,et al.  Better rail stations , 2009 .

[27]  Daniel Albalate,et al.  The Economics and Politics of High-Speed Rail: Lessons from Experiences Abroad , 2012 .

[28]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Measuring Public Transport Connectivity Performance Applied in Auckland, New Zealand , 2009 .

[29]  T R Hickey,et al.  SHARED-USE CORRIDORS: A SURVEY OF CURRENT PRACTICE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE , 2003 .

[30]  Gunther Ellwanger,et al.  High Speed for Europe , 1994 .

[31]  Milan Janic,et al.  Integrated transport systems in the European Union: An overview of some recent developments , 2001 .

[32]  Prakash Ranjitkar,et al.  Modeling public-transit connectivity with spatial quality-of-transfer measurements , 2012 .

[33]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Cities on rails : the redevelopment of railway station areas , 1998 .

[34]  P. Hall,et al.  Magic carpets and seamless webs: opportunities and constraints for high-speed trains in Europe , 2009 .

[35]  김성문,et al.  [해외 대학 연구센터 소개] Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , 2012 .

[36]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Predicting Transit Ridership at Stop Level: Role of Service and Urban Form , 2013 .

[37]  David Banister,et al.  Airline and railway integration , 2006 .

[38]  Peter J Haas Modal shift and high-speed rail : a review of the current literature. , 2014 .

[39]  R Clever,et al.  INTEGRATED TIMED TRANSFER: A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE , 1997 .

[40]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..