Estimating sustainable development performance in the electrical wire and cable industry: Applying the integrated fuzzy MADM approach

Abstract This study explores the critical factors influencing sustainable development performance in the electrical wire and cable industry because this industry has potential contributions to sustainability in terms of energy efficiency. Although much previous work identified the factors influencing sustainable development performance, few studies discussed the influential weights of the factors and their interrelationships in this industry from a comprehensive viewpoint. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the feedback and interrelationships among the factors influencing sustainable development performance by an integrated fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) approach including fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy DANP, and fuzzy modified VIKOR methods. The proposed method can provide guidance to prioritize the influential factors in the improvement strategies for achieving the aspired value of sustainable development performance. This paper applies the proposed method in the Taiwanese electrical wire and cable industry as an empirical study. The outcomes indicate that the environmental aspect should be improved firstly, and top management support is the most significant factor influencing sustainable development performance. Additionally, the finding is useful for identifying the priorities of the factors that offer guidance on allocating limited resources to reduce the performance gaps in the Taiwanese electrical wire and cable industry.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[2]  Irwin Brown,et al.  Radio frequency identification technology: An exploratory study on adoption in the South African retail sector , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Ali Diabat,et al.  Analyzing the drivers of green manufacturing with fuzzy approach , 2015 .

[4]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  S. N. Musa,et al.  Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..

[7]  Shu-Hsuan Chang,et al.  A hybrid selection model for emerging technology , 2010 .

[8]  Valérie Botta-Genoulaz,et al.  A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[9]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Multicriteria analysis of sustainable development indicators in the construction minerals industry in China , 2015 .

[11]  Anupama Prashar,et al.  Towards sustainable development in industrial small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An energy sustainability approach , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Frank Figge,et al.  Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework , 2014 .

[13]  Emilio Galdeano-Gómez,et al.  Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Wei Luo,et al.  Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs – integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods , 2017 .

[15]  Frank Figge,et al.  A Paradox Perspective on Corporate Sustainability: Descriptive, Instrumental, and Normative Aspects , 2018 .

[16]  Veronica Soebarto,et al.  Sustainability attitude and performance of construction enterprises: A China study , 2018 .

[17]  Diane Holt,et al.  What Happened to the ‘Development’ in Sustainable Development? Business Guidelines Two Decades After Brundtland , 2014 .

[18]  Won Il Ko,et al.  Integrated system evaluation of nuclear fuel cycle options in China combined with an analytical MCDM framework , 2018 .

[19]  Gaurav Jha,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sintering process for carbon footprint and cost reduction: A comparative study for coke and biomass-derived sintering process , 2020 .

[20]  Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen The many and the few: rounding up the SMEs that manage CSR in the supply chain , 2009 .

[21]  Dusan Schreiber,et al.  Selection and identification of the indicators for quickly measuring sustainability in micro and small furniture industries , 2015 .

[22]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A novel renewable energy selection model for United Nations' sustainable development goals , 2018, Energy.

[23]  J. Shields,et al.  Integrating Sustainability into SME Strategy , 2015 .

[24]  Ismail Erol,et al.  A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain , 2011 .

[25]  A. Sopadang,et al.  Trends and Future Directions in Sustainable Development , 2018 .

[26]  Mark Boulet,et al.  A level-of-analysis issue in resource consumption and environmental behavior research: A theoretical and empirical contradiction. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Bankole Awuzie,et al.  Modelling Organisational Factors Influencing Sustainable Development Implementation Performance in Higher Education Institutions: An Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM) Approach , 2019, Sustainability.

[28]  Jhuma Sadhukhan,et al.  Sustainability indicators for industrial ovens and assessment using Fuzzy set theory and Monte Carlo simulation , 2017 .

[29]  Elita Amrina,et al.  Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[30]  Shaofeng Liu,et al.  State-of-the-art sustainability analysis methodologies for efficient decision support in green production operations , 2011 .

[31]  P. C. Jha,et al.  Effect of product recovery and sustainability enhancing indicators on the location selection of manufacturing facility , 2016 .

[32]  S. T. A. Niaki,et al.  A closed-loop supply chain considering carbon reduction, quality improvement effort, and return policy under two remanufacturing scenarios , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[33]  Haitham Nobanee,et al.  The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential , 2018 .

[34]  Rakesh D. Raut,et al.  Linking big data analytics and operational sustainability practices for sustainable business management , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  Ezutah Udoncy Olugu,et al.  Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[36]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[37]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management , 2008 .

[38]  Claudia Löbbecke,et al.  RFID in the Fashion Industry: Kaufhof Department Stores AG and Gerry Weber International AG Fashion Manufacturer , 2006, MIS Q. Executive.

[39]  Michael J. Pisani,et al.  Why Do Firms Engage in National Sustainability Programs and Transparent Sustainability Reporting? , 2012 .

[40]  Lucie Laurian,et al.  Organizational Factors of Environmental Sustainability Implementation: An Empirical Analysis of US Cities and Counties , 2016 .

[41]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  K. Govindan,et al.  A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach , 2013 .

[43]  Josephine A Fisher,et al.  Sustainability: the missing ingredient in strategy , 2011 .

[44]  Martin L. Martens,et al.  Engaging small‐ and medium‐sized businesses in sustainability , 2010 .

[45]  Özer Uygun,et al.  An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[46]  Bin He,et al.  Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[47]  Jyoti Navare,et al.  The Relationship between Innovation Culture and Innovation Outcomes: Exploring the Effects of Sustainability Orientation and Firm Size , 2018, R&D Management.

[48]  Jari Lyytimäki,et al.  Thermostat or thermometer? A Finnish perspective on the overloaded role of sustainability indicators in societal transition , 2019, Sustainable Development.

[49]  Chao-Che Hsu,et al.  A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports , 2018, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[50]  Jun Sun,et al.  Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[51]  Frank Figge,et al.  Why Architecture Does Not Matter: On the Fallacy of Sustainability Balanced Scorecards , 2018 .