Identifying determinants of bacterial fitness in a model of human gut microbial succession

Significance Postnatal development of the human gut microbiota is linked to healthy growth. Because the number of potential interactions between community components is vast, an unanswered question is what mechanisms determine the form of community assembly (succession). We created a simplified, manipulable in vivo model where bacterial strains cultured from an infant were divided into consortia, representing earlier and later periods in assembly, and introduced in different order into germ-free mice fed infant formula. Measuring strain abundances, bacterial gene expression and levels of gut nutrients, and applying computational tools to deduce interacting features, we identify genomic and metabolic correlates of how strains establish and maintain themselves. This approach may facilitate discoveries of how communities respond to various perturbations and microbiota-directed therapeutics. Human gut microbiota development has been associated with healthy growth but understanding the determinants of community assembly and composition is a formidable challenge. We cultured bacteria from serially collected fecal samples from a healthy infant; 34 sequenced strains containing 103,102 genes were divided into two consortia representing earlier and later stages in community assembly during the first six postnatal months. The two consortia were introduced alone (singly), or sequentially in different order, or simultaneously into young germ-free mice fed human infant formula. The pattern of fitness of bacterial strains observed across the different colonization conditions indicated that later-phase strains substantially outcompete earlier-phase strains, although four early-phase members persist. Persistence was not determined by order of introduction, suggesting that priority effects are not prominent in this model. To characterize succession in the context of the metabolic potential of consortium members, we performed in silico reconstructions of metabolic pathways involved in carbohydrate utilization and amino acid and B-vitamin biosynthesis, then quantified the fitness (abundance) of strains in serially collected fecal samples and their transcriptional responses to different histories of colonization. Applying feature-reduction methods disclosed a set of metabolic pathways whose presence and/or expression correlates with strain fitness and that enable early-stage colonizers to survive during introduction of later colonizers. The approach described can be used to test the magnitude of the contribution of identified metabolic pathways to fitness in different community contexts, study various ecological processes thought to govern community assembly, and facilitate development of microbiota-directed therapeutics.

[1]  Richard J. Giannone,et al.  Interspecies Competition Impacts Targeted Manipulation of Human Gut Bacteria by Fiber-Derived Glycans , 2019, Cell.

[2]  Richard J. Giannone,et al.  Effects of microbiota-directed foods in gnotobiotic animals and undernourished children , 2019, Science.

[3]  Michael J. Barratt,et al.  A sparse covarying unit that describes healthy and impaired human gut microbiota development , 2019, Science.

[4]  S. Peterson,et al.  Micronutrient Requirements and Sharing Capabilities of the Human Gut Microbiome , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[5]  Kevin S. Bonham,et al.  Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases , 2019, Nature.

[6]  Eric J Alm,et al.  Adaptive Evolution within Gut Microbiomes of Healthy People. , 2019, Cell host & microbe.

[7]  Eddy J. Bautista,et al.  Longitudinal multi-omics of host–microbe dynamics in prediabetes , 2019, Nature.

[8]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study , 2018, Nature.

[9]  C. Huttenhower,et al.  The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study , 2018, Nature.

[10]  Mikhail Tikhonov,et al.  Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly , 2017, Science.

[11]  Michael J. Barratt,et al.  The effects of micronutrient deficiencies on bacterial species from the human gut microbiota , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  Mehdi Layeghifard,et al.  Disentangling Interactions in the Microbiome: A Network Perspective , 2016, Trends in Microbiology.

[13]  Yangqing Peng,et al.  Development of the gut microbiota and mucosal IgA responses in twins and gnotobiotic mice , 2016, Nature.

[14]  R. Haque,et al.  Regulators of Gut Motility Revealed by a Gnotobiotic Model of Diet-Microbiome Interactions Related to Travel , 2015, Cell.

[15]  Bernard Henrissat,et al.  Genetic determinants of in vivo fitness and diet responsiveness in multiple human gut Bacteroides , 2015, Science.

[16]  R. Haque,et al.  Regulators of Gut Motility Revealed by a Gnotobiotic Model of Diet-Microbiome Interactions Related to Travel , 2015, Cell.

[17]  D. Gordon The Ecology of Collective Behavior , 2014, PLoS biology.

[18]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  A genomic update on clostridial phylogeny: Gram-negative spore formers and other misplaced clostridia. , 2013, Environmental microbiology.

[19]  Bernard Henrissat,et al.  Effects of Diet on Resource Utilization by a Model Human Gut Microbiota Containing Bacteroides cellulosilyticus WH2, a Symbiont with an Extensive Glycobiome , 2013, PLoS biology.

[20]  J. Raes,et al.  Microbial interactions: from networks to models , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[21]  W. Bialek,et al.  Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Najeeb M. Halabi,et al.  Protein Sectors: Evolutionary Units of Three-Dimensional Structure , 2009, Cell.

[23]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[24]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[25]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[26]  Naryttza N. Diaz,et al.  The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  Network thinking in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[29]  J A Sherratt,et al.  Dictyostelium discoideum: cellular self-organization in an excitable biological medium , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  H. Andrews,et al.  Singular value decompositions and digital image processing , 1976 .

[31]  T. Pohlert The Pairwise Multiple Comparison of Mean Ranks Package (PMCMR) , 2016 .

[32]  Danielle M. Varda,et al.  A Network Perspective , 2009 .

[33]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  : Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology , 2022 .