A Coevolutionary Model for Actions and Opinions in Social Networks

In complex social networks, the decision-making mechanisms behind human actions and the cognitive processes that shape opinion formation processes are often intertwined, leading to complex and varied collective emergent behavior. In this paper, we propose a mathematical model that captures such a coevolution of actions and opinions. Following a discrete-time process, each individual decides between binary actions, aiming to coordinate with the actions of other members observed on a network of interactions and taking into account their own opinion. At the same time, the opinion of each individual evolves due to the opinions shared by other members, the actions observed on the network, and, possibly, an external influence source. We provide a global convergence result for a special case of the coupled dynamics. Steady state configurations in which all the individuals take the same action are then studied, elucidating the role of the model parameters and the network structure on the collective behavior of the system.

[1]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Cooperative Control and Potential Games , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[2]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[3]  Roberto Tempo,et al.  A Tutorial on Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Social Networks. Part II , 2018, Annu. Rev. Control..

[4]  Ming Cao,et al.  Networks of conforming or nonconforming individuals tend to reach satisfactory decisions , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  The spread of innovations in social networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Antonio Petitti,et al.  On the convergence of the max-consensus protocol with asynchronous updates , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  Andre C. R. Martins,et al.  CONTINUOUS OPINIONS AND DISCRETE ACTIONS IN OPINION DYNAMICS PROBLEMS , 2007, 0711.1199.

[8]  Irinel-Constantin Morarescu,et al.  Continuous opinions and discrete actions in social networks: A multi-agent system approach , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[9]  Peter Duggins,et al.  A Psychologically-Motivated Model of Opinion Change with Applications to American Politics , 2014, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[10]  Robert J. Plemmons,et al.  Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences , 1979, Classics in Applied Mathematics.

[11]  Floriana Gargiulo,et al.  Influence of Opinion Dynamics on the Evolution of Games , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  A. Olsson,et al.  The Role of a “Common Is Moral” Heuristic in the Stability and Change of Moral Norms , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[14]  Ming Cao,et al.  A two-layer model for coevolving opinion dynamics and collective decision-making in complex social systems , 2020, Chaos.

[15]  M. Macy,et al.  The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self‐Enforcing Norms1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[17]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  An Influence Network Model to Study Discrepancies in Expressed and Private Opinions , 2018, Autom..

[18]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[19]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social influence and opinions , 1990 .

[20]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  The dynamics of social innovation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  The Problem of Social Control and Coordination of Complex Systems in Sociology: A Look at the Community Cleavage Problem , 2015, IEEE Control Systems.